Through the Microscope: Understanding “The Tempest” in the Context of the Introduction to Pico della Mirandola’s “Oration on the Dignity of Man” (Translated from English by Iryna Satygo)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2016.94.030Keywords:
William Shakespeare, “The Tempest”, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, “Oration on the Dignity of Man”, intertext, reception, interpretationAbstract
In the format of interpretation the creative laboratory of Shakespeare’s “The Tempest” is being revealed. By all accounts “The Tempest” has no specific sources. This study, however, supposes, that Shakespeare could refer to the basic concept and, from this perspective, even very closely rely on the details. Hence, it is proved, that the philosophical impulse of Shakespeare’s tragedy can be considered the introduction to the “Oration on the Dignity of Man” by Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, created for the forbidden later theological discussions on relevant topics in Rome (1486), which dealt with the possibility of moral self-determination and individual responsibility. Imposing the lines of the treatise by Pico on the images and plot of the drama by Shakespeare, we immediately notice a twisted three-dimensional image, the transition from abstract relationship to the visible processes of existence and consciousness, at the same time fantastic and real. This analysis is based on the statement, that “The Tempest” can be interpreted as the staging of memorable images of Pico. This statement is relevant to point of view, according to which Shakespeare could choose the idea of the Oration, or directly from the passage of the text. Shakespeare consciously goes beyond the ideas of Pico. If the quotations from the text of Pico are considered as a subtext, it immediately becomes evident that scene, characters and action of the play are based in some way on a complex conceptual scheme. With the underlying meaning of the Oration by Pico, “The Tempest” is a powerful creative experiment and a reasonable appeal to the uniqueness of human life and spiritual freedom of a man. Thus, this study, without resorting to discuss specific aspects of the play, aspires to promote scientific debate about its hidden meaning.References
Aquinas, St Thomas. Of the Various Kinds of Law, q. 91, art. 1, FS. In: The Summa Theologica : in 3 vols. New York, 1947–1948, vol. 1. Available at: http://dhspriory.org/thomas/summa/FS/FS091.html#FSQ91OUTP1 (accessed 15 August 2015).
Aquinas, St Thomas. Questiones Disputatae de Veritate, q. 17, art. 1. In: Truth : in 3 vols. Chicago, 1952–1954. Available at: http://dhspriory.org/thomas/QDdeVer.htm (accessed 15 August 2015).
Bloom H. Shakespeare. The Invention of the Human. London, 1999, 745 p.
Cassirer E. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. Garden City, 1954, 294 p.
Collected Works of Erasmus. Toronto, 1974, vol.1, 368 p.
Craven W. G. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Symbol of his Age: Modern Interpretations of a Renaissance Philosopher. Genève, 1981, 173 p.
Döring T. Change and Strange: Transformations of Shakespeare's The Tempest. An Introduction. In: Critical and Cultural Transformations: Shakespeare's 'The Tempest' – 1611 to the Present. Tübingen, 2013, pp. xi–xxi.
Grant P. The Magic of Charity: A Background to Prospero. Review of English Studies, 1976, vol. 27, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/res/XXVII.105.1
Kermode F. Introduction. In: Shakespeare W. The Tempest. London, 1983, pp. xi–xciii.
Kristeller P. O. Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance. London, 1965, 194 p.
Kristeller P. O. Renaissance Thought II: Papers on Humanism and Arts. New York, 1965, 234 p.
Lowell J. R. Shakespeare Once More. In: The Writings of James Russell Lowell in Prose and Poetry. Volume 3: Literary Essays. Boston, 1910, pp. 1–94.
McConica J. Thomas More as Humanist. In: The Cambridge Companion to Thomas More. Cambridge, 2011, pp. 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521888622.003
Mirandola G. P. On the Dignity of Man. On being and the One. Heptaplus. Indianapolis, 1998, 174 p.
Nabokov V. Strong Opinions. New York, 1990, 335 p.
O'Donnel A. M. Erasmus Desiderius (c. 1466/1469–1536). In: The Routledge Encyclopedia of Tudor England. London, 2010, pp. 237–238.
Safranski R. Das Böse oder das Drama der Freiheit [Evil or the Drama of Freedom]. Frankfurt, 1999, 334 p.
Shakespeare W. The Tempest: An Authoritative Text, Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. New York, 2004, 355 p.
Stoll E. E. Shakespeare and other Masters. Cambridge, 1940, 430 p. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674594180
Stoll E. E. Shakespeare's Young Lovers; The Alexander Lectures at the University of Toronto, 1935. London, New York, 1937, 118 p.
Strachey L. Shakespeare's Final Period. In: Books and Characters: French and English. London, 1934, pp. 41–56.
Vaughan A. T., Vaughan V. M. Shakespeare's Caliban: A Cultural History. Cambridge, 1991, 290 p.
Vaughan V. M., Vaughan A. T. Additions and Reconsiderations. In: Shakespeare W. The Tempest. London, 2011, pp. 139–160.
Vaughan V. M., Vaughan A. T. Introduction. In: Shakespeare W. The Tempest. London, 2011, pp. 1–138.
Yates F. A. Shakespeare's Last Plays: A New Approach. London, 1975, 140 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Michaela Krämer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
