Psychoanalytic Research in Modern Ukrainian Literary Criticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2015.91.220Keywords:
psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic narrative, psychoanalytic studies, psychoanalytic background, Ukrainian theoretical and literary discourseAbstract
The article is devoted to the technique of psychoanalytic literary interpretation in Ukrainian literary criticism. The article deals with the importance and relevance of psychoanalytic narrative’s research. The specificity of the adaptation of psychoanalysis to the Ukrainian cultural space is defined. The basic milestones in the formation and development of psychoanalytic research in Ukrainian literary criticism from the early XX to XXI centuries are given and the main stages of the psychoanalytic school in Ukraine are also outlined. The expediency of studying psychoanalysis as a method of research and interpretation of contemporary fiction literature is proved. The detailed review of Ukrainian researchers’ critical works on the application of psychoanalysis in the study of the writers’ personality and creative works is realized to justify its use to contemporary literature. A lot of attention is paid to works that are appearing in Ukrainian literary and theoretical discourse in recent years (works of S. Pavlychko, N. Zborovska, M. Ilnytskyi, T. Hundorova, M. Moklytsia, I. Zherebkina, A. Pecharskyi, A. Bidiuk and others). They allow to extend the range of psychoanalytic studies involved in literary criticism. The main task of literature of recent decades is clearly outlined. An analysis of the effectiveness of psychoanalytic methodology is trying to be made. According to this aim it is proposed to pay attention to the works of contemporary literature that are written using the psychoanalytic implication (works of N. Zborovska, O. Zabuzhko, E. Kononenko). The discursive method is used in research.
References
Balei S. Z psykhol′ohiï tvorchosty Shevchenka [From the psychology of Shevchenko’s creative works]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 132–186. (in Ukrainian).
Berhler E. Psykhoanaliz. Sut′ i znachinnia nauky prof. Z. Freida [Psychoanalysis. The nature and importance of Freud’s science]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 186–206. (in Ukrainian).
Haievs′kyi S. Fraidyzm u literaturoznavstvi [Freudism in literary criticism]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 260–268. (in Ukrainian).
Zborovs′ka N. V. Psykhoanaliz i literaturoznavstvo [Psychoanalysis and literary criticism]. Kyiv, 2003, 392 p. (in Ukrainian).
Krivulia A. M. Predislovie [Preface]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 6–7. (in Russian).
Kut'ko I. I. Kharkov v kontekste istorii ukrainskogo psikhoanaliza [Kharkov in the context of Ukrainian history of psychoanalysis]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 8–29. (in Russian).
Levchuk L. T. Psykhoanaliz: istoriia, teoriia, mystets′ka praktyka [Psychoanalysis: history, theory, art practice]. Kyiv, 2002, 255 p. (in Ukrainian).
Pavlychko S. Teoriia literatury [Literature theory]. Kyiv, 2002, 679 p. (in Ukrainian).
Pechars′kyi A. Metodyka psykhoanalitychnoï literaturnoï interpretatsiï v Ukraïni: henezys, problematyka, novi perspektyvy [The technique of psychoanalytic literary interpretation in Ukraine: genesis, issues, new perspectives]. Visnyk L′vivs′koho universytetu, seriia filolohichna, 2008, no. 44, p. 1, pp. 248–254. Avaliable at: http://litmisto.org.ua/?p=18993 (accessed 20 September 2015). (in Ukrainian).
Pidmohyl′nyi V. Ivan Levyts′kyi-Nechui (Sproba psykhoanalizy tvorchosty) [Ivan Levitskyi-Nechui (An attempt of psychoanalysis’ creative works)]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 280–293. (in Ukrainian).
Franko I. Iz sekretiv poetychnoï tvorchosti [From the secrets of poetic creative works]. In: Zibrannia tvoriv. Kyiv, 1981, vol. 31, pp. 45–119. Avaliable at: http://www.ukrlib.com.ua/books/printout.php?id=27&bookid=13 (accessed 20 September 2015). (in Ukrainian).
Freid Z. Ia i Ono. Trudy raznykh let [Me and It. Works of different years]. Tbilisi, 1991, 400 p. (in Russian).
Khaletskii A. M. Psikhoanaliz lichnosti i tvorchestva Shevchenko [Psychoanalysis of Shevchenko’s personality and creative works]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 230–239. (in Russian).
Khmelevskii I. K. Patologicheskyi element v lichnosti i tvorchestve Fridrikha Nitsshe [The pathological element in the personality and works of Friedrich Nietzsche]. In: Istoriia psikhoanaliza v Ukraine. Kharkiv, 1996, pp. 51–80. (in Russian).
The Freud-Jung Letters: The Correspondence Between Sigmund Freud and C. G. Jung. Londres, 1974, 495 p. Avaliable at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/78404737/The-Freud-Jung-Letters-TheCorrespondence-Between-Sigmund-Freud-and-C-G-Jung#scribd (accessed 20 September 2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Svitlana Natiazhko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
