Sociality in the Structure of Modern Literature Criticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2013.88.234Keywords:
sociality, literary criticism, literary studies methodology, word-cultural space, verbal and cultural process, the product literatureAbstract
The article raises the problem of sociality and justified in its relations with the verbal and cultural space. It is proved that the social has always been designed to identify the specific interaction of the space of literature and society, time, history, ideology, and everyday life, actualizing their relationship's communication, its creation and its readers, especially their cultural communication network. However, the current literature, for which although still and focus on the inherent social aspects of verbal and cultural space, in contrast to the classical literature turovedeniya oriented at other values of the role and nature of literature, The detection-ruzhivaet insufficient attention and sensitivity to the social, sold directly to the verbal-cultural space. Naturally, this all leads to an interest in social in qualitatively new conditions for the existence of literary theory, but at the same time, the relevance is determined and a sort of “abandonment” of the social in contemporary literary criticism. She, sociality, as it were, is a kind of stumbling block for modern literary criticism, tried to comprehend what had always been an integral and valuable part of the structural integrity under-May and take the words and cultural space, where, according to Berdyaev, “all the threads converge dyatsya central idea of the Logos”. But at the same time, social regarded primarily as a phenomenon of discursive practices, verbal and cultural and philosophical context, the socio-historical sentiment. Sociality breaks and overcomes specific verbal and cultural space, while introducing it in a broad context and entering into it as some additional, conditioned by time and age, bedding. That is one side. But on the other – all this leads to the sociological method in literary criticism, not so much when the actual fabric of the study, especially the verbal, cultural and creative processes, how many times and with the state of their “break” sociality. However, in a qualitatively new ideological and cultural conditions for the existence of modern literary criticism, sociality has not received proper Literary On reflection, rather consistently developed methods. It is this aspect and is relevant to the literature.
References
Berdiaev N. A. Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial’nye i literaturnye (1900 – 1906) [Sub specie aeternitatis. Experiments philosophical, social, and literary (1900 – 1906)]. Moscow, 2002, 656 p. (in Russian).
Chernets L. V., Khalizev V. E., Esalnek A. Ia i dr. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie [Introduction to Literary Studies]. Moscow, 2006, 680 p. (in Russian).
Venediktova T. Sekret sredinnogo mira: kul'turnaia funktsiia realizma XIX v. [The Secret of the median of the world: cultural function realism XIX century]. In: Zarubezhnaia literatu-ra vtorogo tysiacheletiia. 1000-2000. [Foreign literature ra second millennium. 1000–2000]. Moscow, 2001. Available at: http://www.philol.msu.ru/~forlit/Pages/Biblioteka_Vened_Realism.htm. (accessed 3 December 2012). (in Russian).
Virk T. Sravnitel'noe literaturovedenie segodnia – i zavtra? [Comparative Literature today – and tomorrow?]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 9 Filologiia, 2003, no. 5, pp.168–197. (in Russian).
De Man P. Allegorii chteniia: Figural'nyi iazyk Russo, Nitsshe, Ril'ke i Prusta [Allegories of reading: figural language of Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke and Proust]. Yekaterinburg, 1999, 368 p. (in Russian).
Domanskii Iu. V. Smysloobrazuiushchaia rol' arkhetipicheskikh znachenii v literaturnom tekste [The semantic role of archetypal values in the literary text]. Tver, 2001, 94 p. (in Russian).
Dubin B. Slovo – pis'mo – literatura: Ocherki po sotsiologii sovremennoi kul'tury [Word – letter – Literature: Essays on the sociology of contemporary culture]. Moscow, 2001, 416 p. (in Russian).
Zhirmunskii V. M. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie : kurs lektsii [Introduction to Literary Studies : Lectures]. Moscow, 2004, 464 p. (in Russian).
Literaturnaia entsiklopediia terminov i poniatii [Literary Encyclopedia of terms and concepts]. Moscow, 2003, 1600 col. (in Russian).
Literaturnyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar [Literary encyclopedia]. Moscow, 1987, 752 p. (in Russian).
Lіteratura. Teorіia. Metodologіia [Literature. Theory. Methodology]. Kyiv, 2006, 543 p. (in Ukrainian).
Lіteraturoznavchii slovnik-dovіdnik [Literary dictionary]. Kyiv, 2006, 752 p. (in Ukrainian).
Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa [Dialectics of Myth]. In: Opyty: literaturno-filosofskii sbornik. Moscow, 1990, pp. 137–174. (in Russian).
Materialy k “Slovariu siuzhetov i motivov russkoi literatury” [Materials for the “Dictionary of subjects and motifs of Russian literature”]. Novosibirsk, 1996, 194 p. (in Russian).
Mikhailov A. V. Metody i stili literatury [Techniques and styles of literature]. Moscow, 2008, 176 p. (in Russian).
Postmodernizm: entsiklopediia [Postmodernism. Encyclopedia]. Minsk, 2001, 1040 p. (in Russian).
Poetika: slovar' aktual'nykh terminov i poniatii [Poetics: a dictionary of current terms and concepts]. Moscow, 2008, 358 p. (in Russian).
Problemy sovremennogo sravnitel'nogo literaturovedeniia [Problems of modern comparative literature]. Moscow, 2004, 96 p. (in Russian).
Slovar'-ukazatel' siuzhetov i motivov russkoi literatury: eksperimental'noe izdanie [Dictionary-pointer themes and motifs of Russian literature: Experimental edition]. Novosibirsk, 2003, vol. 1, 243 p. (in Russian).
Teoriia literatury [Theory of Literature]. Moscow, 2007, vols. 1–2. (in Russian).
Halych O., Nazarets′ V., Vasyl′iev Ie. Teorіia lіteraturi [Theory of Literature]. Kyiv, 2001, 488 p. (in Ukrainian).
Tkachenko A. O. Mistetstvo slova: vstup do lіteraturoznavstva [Art of word: Entered to Literary Criticism]. Kyiv, 2003, 448 p. (in Ukrainian).
Fedotova V. G., Kolpakov V. A., Fedotova N. N. Meniaiushchaiasia sotsial'nost' [Changing social]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 6, 2011. Available at: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=332&Itemid=52 (accessed 3 December 2012). (in Russian).
Fesenko E. Ia. Teoriia literatury: uchebnoe posobie dlia vuzov [Theory of Literature]. Moscow, 2008, 780 p. (in Russian).
Khalizev V. E. Teoriia literatury [Theory of Literature]. Moscow, 2002, 437 p. (in Russian).
Kheller A. Dva stolpa sovremennoi etiki [The two pillars of modern ethics]. Voprosy filosofii, 2004, № 3. Available at: http://logos101.ru/texts/heller.htm. (accessed 22 December 2012). (in Russian).
Khima G. Sovremennye napravleniia v literaturovedenii [Contemporary trends in literary criticism]. Kyiv, 2000, 180 p. (in Russian).
Eko U. Otsutstvuiushchaia struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiiu [The Absent Structure]. Sankt-Peterburg, 1998, 380 p. (in Russian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Eleonora Shestakova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
