The Creation of Doxa (Legitimization of Knowledge and Institualization of Notions) in Gender Studies in the Study of Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2013.88.210Keywords:
gender studies, scientific knowledge, narrative knowledge, feminist epistemology, scientific languageAbstract
In the article analyzes the specifics of scientific knowledge legitimization in gender studies, actualized as the issue of the knowledge production point. Increased focus on gender studies in postmodern philology is linked to the general tendencies of science development, viz. with the search for theories able to provide alternative ways of knowledge. Gender studies in literature, as a theoretical project, in this sense are consonant to the search of the literary theory, as both see themselves in the review of humanitarian knowledge, at the core of which is the impossibility of a single critical notion of a human. It’s no coincidence that Joan Scott, reflecting on the analytic potential of gender approach, notes, that the discovery of gender coincided in time with a radical epistemological change, which marked in post-classic science the transition from scientific to literary paradigms. And in this field, gender studies, as well as the majority of modern critique theories, faces the requirement of researchers (such as a literature historian, for example) to realize their own research methods, which, however, contradicts the “basic” incapability to overcome their own subjectiveness. This lie of the land actualizes the problem of establishing gender studies in post-Soviet humanities in the context of scientific knowledge generation. In the article is analyzed Gender studies in the study of literature in such context appear as strategic inconsistently-sceptical theoretical project.
References
Braidotti R. Zavist', ili s tvoimi mozgami i moej krasotoj… [Envy, or with your brains and my beauty ...]. Gendernye issledovanija, 2006, no. 14, pp. 157–167. (in Russian).
Gaidenko V. A. Feministskaja jepistemologija kak postneklassicheskij fenomen [Feminist Epistemology as a Post-Nonclassic Phenomena]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Philosophy). Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kyiv, 2000, 20 p. (in Russian).
Gapova E. Gendernye issledovanija kak zerkalo postsovetskoj akademii [Gender studies as a mirror of the post-Soviet Academy]. In: Antropologija akademicheskoj zhizni: mezhdisciplinarnye issledovanija. Moscow, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 64–85. (in Russian).
Hundorova T. Metodolohichnyi tysk (Problemy ukraïns′koho literaturoznavstva) [Methodological Pressure (Problems of Ukrainian Literary Studies)]. Krytyka, 2002, no. 12, pp. 14–17. (in Ukrainian).
Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Jedip: Kapitalizm i shizofrenija [Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]. Ekaterinburg, 2008, 672 p. (in Russian).
Derrida J. Shpory: stili Nicshe [Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles]. Filosofskie nauki, 1991. no. 2, pp. 118–142; no. 3, pp. 114–129. (in Russian).
Lacan J. Seminary. Kniga 20 [The Seminar, Book XX]. Moscow, 2011, 176 p. (in Russian).
Lyotard J.-F. Sostojanie postmoderna [Toward the Postmodern]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, 1998, 160 p. (in Russian).
Marcuse H. Odnomernyj chelovek [One-Dimensional Man]. Moscow, 1994, 368 p. (in Russian).
Moi T. Seksual'naja/tekstual'naja politika: Feministskaja literaturnaja teorija [Sexual/textual politics: feminist literary theory]. Moscow, 2004. 240 p. (in Russian).
Oushakine S. Pole pola [Field of Sex].Vilnius, Moscow, 2007, 320 p. (in Russian).
Foucault M. Volja k istine: po tu storonu znanija, vlasti i seksual'nostі [The Will to Truth]. Moscow, 1996, 448 p. (in Russian).
Jakobson R. Lingvistika i pojetika [Linguistics and Poetics]. In: Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv”. Moscow, 1975, pp. 193–230. (in Russian).
Code L. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, New York, 1991. – 349 p.
Felman S. Women and Madness: The critical phallacy. Diacritics. Textual Politics Feminist Criticism, 1975, Winter, pp. 2–10.
Hix H. L. Spirits Hovering over the Ashes: Legacies of Postmodern Theory. Albany, 1995, 208 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Ganna Uliura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.