On the Problem of Colonial Fiction Motives in the English Neo-Victorian Novel

Authors

  • Yuliya Skorokhod’ko Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2013.88.200

Keywords:

late neo-Victorian novel, neo-Victorian postcolonial novel, late neo-Victorian novel with colonial fiction motives, Victorianism, Britishness, colonial novel, M. Faber, A. Soueif, A. Ghosh, L. Fish, J. Rhys

Abstract

The article focuses on the neo-Victorian postcolonial novel and on the late neo-Victorian novel with the colonial motives. The article explores genre peculiarities of these modifications of the late neo-Victorian novel. The article focuses on the problem of Britishness as a base of an English identity. ‘British’ features are the peculiar characteristics of any Victorian or modern Englishman. Understanding English national character with its Britishness is a key to the neo-Victorian postcolonial novel and the late neo-Victorian novel with the colonial motives appropriate reading. To achieve the aims of the article the following methods of literary analysis were used: typological, cultural and historical, comparative methods and intertextual analysis. Through the careful analyses of the neo-Victorian novels the author of the article concludes that Victorian colonial novels are the predecessors of the neo-Victorian novels with colonial motives as well as the neo-Victorian postcolonial novels. The basic differences between these varieties of the late neo-Victorian novel are determined by the origin of their author. As the author of the neo-Victorian postcolonial novel originates from the former colonies, such novels focuses on the postcolonial problematics and correspond to the postcolonial canon but not to the neo-Victorian one. On the contrary neo-Victorian novel with the colonial pastiches and parodies Victorian fiction. The prospects of the research include the further exploration of the neo-Victorian postcolonial novel and neo-Victorian novel with the colonial motives.

Author Biography

Yuliya Skorokhod’ko, Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University

Department of Russian and World Literature Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University Vernadsky Ave., 4, 95007, Simferopol, Ukraine

References

Kalmykova V. Postcolonialny roman: vzgliad iznutri [Postcolonial Novel: View from Inside]. Inostrannaya literatura, 2009, no. 11, pp. 289–293. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/inostran/2009/11/ka26.html (accessed 1 February 2012). (in Russian).

Sidorova O. S. Britansliy postcolonialny roman posledney treti XX veka v contekste literatury velikobritanii [1970–2000s British Postcolonial Novel in the Context of British Literature]. PhD dissertation (Literature of the Foreign Countries). Moscow State University. Moscow, 2005, 333 p. (in Russian).

Skorokhod'ko Yu. S. Zhanrovaya spetsifika angliyskogo neovictorianskogo romana 1990–2000-h godov [Genre Peculiarities of the English Neo-Victorian Novel of the 1990–2000s]. PhD dissertation (Literature of the Foreign Countries). Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University. Simferopol, 2012, 217 p. (in Russian).

Faulz J. Byt’ anglichaninom, a ne britantsem [On being English but not British]. In: Krotoviye Nory. Moscow, 2004, pp. 125–138. (in Russian).

Feyber M. Bagroviy lepestok i beliy [The Crimson Petal and the White]. Moscow, 2004, 872 p. Available at: http://readfree.ru/book/C1047/ (accessed 22 October 2009). (in Russian).

Burges A. English Literature. London, 1974, 278 p.

Faber M. The Crimson Petal and the White. Edinburgh, 2002, 835 p.

Gamble A., Wright T. Introduction: The Britishness Question. In: Britishness: Perspectives on the British Question. Chichester, 2009, pp. 1–9.

Heilmann A., Llewellyn M. Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-first Century, 1999–2009. London, 2010, 323 p.

James L. The Victorian Novel. Oxford, 2006, 246 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470775844

Johnson R. The British Empire: Pomp, Power and Postcolonialism. Penrith, 2007, 79 p.

Kumar K. The Making of English National Identity. Cambridge, 2003, 367 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550058

McDonald T. Resurrecting Isis in Ahdaf Soueif’s The Map of Love. In : Hermes and Aphrodite Encounters. Tuscaloosa, 2002, pp. 163–170.

Said E. W. Orientalism. New York, 2003, 432 p.

Spivak G. Can the Subaltern Speak?. In: Can the Subaltern Speak?: Reflections on the History of an Idea. New York, 2010, pp. 21–78.

Wellings B. England. In : Nations and Nationalism: A Global Historical Overview. Santa Barbara, 2008, pp. 158–168.

Young R. Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, 2003, 180 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192801821.001.0001

Published

2013-12-06

How to Cite

Skorokhod’ko, Y. “On the Problem of Colonial Fiction Motives in the English Neo-Victorian Novel”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 88, Dec. 2013, pp. 200-9, doi:10.31861/pytlit2013.88.200.

Issue

Section

Historical Poetics and History of Poetological Discourses