An Anthology as a Representative Genre in Contemporary Ukrainian Literature


  • Olena Haleta Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine



anthology, meta-genre, genealogy, tradition, canon, Modern, Postmodern


In this article is analyzed a history and functions of an anthology in a modern Ukrainian literature from the last quarter of the 19th c. to the beginning of the 21st. An anthology is treated as a literary and anthropological project which is characterized by recasting of original materials and specific politics of its re-arangement. It proposes a new cultural value hierarchy, defines a literary field and the rules of its organization. As a form of literary self-representation an anthology participates in a process of forming a literary tradition and canon, its diversification up to the emergence of anti-canon; it intensifies a work of cultural memory, represents new literary genres and styles and also indicates an appearance of diaspora as a model of cultural citizenship. Numerous anthological projects also stress spacial, performative, subjective, gender, erotical, somatic, and oneirological aspects of creative writing; they rethink a very nature of literature as a creative experiment and as a social action in a context of mass culture and new media development. This allows us to consider the literary anthology as a way of a literary self-reflection and as a separate meta-genre in modern Ukrainian literature. The main genre-defining anthological qualities are such as selectivity, double methonimity, integrity and an ability to create new cultural values. The history of anthology as a specific meta-genre helps us to understand the general pecularities of modenr and postmodern literature, its structure and principles of development, its key problems and challanges and also its the most important achievements.

Author Biography

Olena Haleta, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

Department of Literary Theory and Literary Comparative Studies Ivan Franko National University of Lviv Universytetska St. 1/247, 79000, Lviv, Ukraine


Bol'shakova A. Sovremennye teorii zhanra v anglo-amerikanskom literaturovedenii [Comtemporary genre theories in English-American literary studies] In: Teoria literatury: v 4-kh t. [Theory of literature: in 4 v.]. V. ІІІ: Rody i zhanry: osnovnye problemy v istoricheskom osveshchenii [Kinds and genres: main problems in historical perspective]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 99–132. (in Russian).

Sviato R. Poezia ne vrozdrib, abo sens antolohii [Poetry not at retail, or a sense of anthologies] In: Litakcent. Available at: 2011/06/10/poezija-ne-vrozdrib-abo-sens-antolohij/ (accessed 20 December 2013). (in Ukrainian).

Smirnov I. Oliteraturennoe vremia: (gipo)teoria literaturnykh zhanrov [Literature under time: (hypo)theory of literary genres]. St. Petersburg, 2008, 264 p. (in Russian).

Kharkhun V. Socrealistychnyj kanon v ukrains’kij literaturi: heneza, rozvytok, modyfikacii [Socrealistic canon in Ukrainian literature: genesis, development, modification]. Nizhyn, 2009, 508 p. (in Ukrainian).

Assmann A. Zeit und Tradition: Kulturelle Strategien der Dauer. Koeln, Weimar, Wien, 1999, 167 p.

Bachelard G. The Poetics of Space. Boston, 1994, 241 p.

Benedetti C. The Empty Cage. Inquiry into the Mysterious Disapperance of the Author. Ithaca and London, 2005, 232 p.

Bhabha H. The Location of Culture. London, 1994, 285 p.

Brooker P. Modernity and Metropolis: Writing, Film and Urban Formation. New York, 2002, 230 p.

Culler J. Towards a Theory of Non-Genre Literature. In: Surfiction: Fiction Now and Tomorrow. Chicago, 1975, pp. 255–259.

Derrida J. The Law of Genre. In: Critical Inquiry, 1980, vol. 7, no 1, Autumn, pp. 55–81.

Dubrow H. Genre. London, New York, 1982, 133 p.

Fowler A. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, Mass., 1982, 357 p.

Fowler A. The Future of Genre Theory. In: Future Literary Theory. London, New York, 1989, pp. 291–303.

Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford, 1989, 378 p.

Jahraus O. Literaturtheorie: Theoretische und methodologische Grundlagen der Literaturwissenschaft. Tuebingen, 2004, 399 p.

Kenth T. Interpretation and Genre: The Role of Generic Reception in the Study of Narrative Text. London, 1986, 180 p.

Lacoue-Labarthe P., Nancy J.-L. Genres. In: Postmodern Literary Theory: An Anthology, ed. by N. Lucy. Oxford, UK, Maiden, Mass., 2000, 545 p.

Literary Landscapes: From Modernism to Postcolonialism. New York, 2008, 221 p.

Literary Theory Today. Cambridge, 1990, 249 p.

Literatures of Memory: History, Time and Space in Postwar Writing. Manchester, New York, 2000, 323 p.

Ommundsen W. Have Culture, Will Travel: Cultural Citizenship and the Imagined Communities of Diaspora; A Fiction. In: Reading of the Particular: The Postcolonial in the Postnational. Amsterdam, New York, 2007, pp. 3–17.

Pettersson A. A Theory of Literary Discourse. Lund, 1990, 275 p.

Rosmarin A. The Power of Genre. Minneapolis, 1985, 199 p.

Taylor R. Understanding the Elements of Literature: Its Forms, Techniques and Cultural Conventions. London, 1981, 234 p.

Tölölyan K. The Nation-State and Its Others: In Lieu of a Preface. In: Diaspora, no. 1.1, 1991, pp. 3–7.

Turner B. S. Outline of a General Theory of Cultural Citizenship. In: Culture and Citizenship. London, 2001, pp. 157–172.



How to Cite

Haleta, O. “An Anthology As a Representative Genre in Contemporary Ukrainian Literature”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 88, Dec. 2013, pp. 157-72, doi:10.31861/pytlit2013.88.157.



Genre Study