Modern French Studding of the Biographical Texts: Prolegomena

Alina Hromyk

Abstract


The article deals with the main directions of the studding of the biography as a text in the modern French humanities. We described the structural and the functional peculiarities of the biographical text (discourse), particularly based on the fictional biography. It is stressed on the terminology, which is used by scientists not only literary and interdisciplinary studies, particularly “fictionality”, “biofiction”, “fictional biography”. Attention is given to agents of the works and of the narrative, it is stressed on their discourse and the narrative functions, particularly the relations between the author, the subject and the object of the biography. We noted that the biography as a narrative studded in two opposite fields – the field of the referential and the field of the fictional, particularly the fictional biography takes on the forms of the different literature genres, linking the features of the fictional and the factual. However, it keeps the status of the fictitious notably the works of literature. As the different genres forms contain the different proportions of the representation of the factual and the fictional the biographical text redefine the limits between stable genre categories. We are differentiated two main poles – “novel pole”, which describe the fictional questions, and the “essay pole”, which promote the studding of the biographical ethos, which is important in the relations between the ethos’ object and the ethos’ subject of the biography as a text. We stressed the scientific productivity of the ethos’ concept for the representation of the speaker in the discourse. 


Keywords


biographical text; biographical narrative; biographical discourse; biographical ethos; factual / fictional

References


Bakhtin M. Problema tekstu u lingvistytsi, filologii ta inshykh gumanitarnykh naukakh [Problem of the Text in Linguistic, Philology and other Humanities]. In: Slovo. Znak. Dyskurs. Antolohiia svitovoï literaturno-krytychnoï dumky XX st. Lviv, 1996, pp. 318–323. (in Ukrainian).

Halych O. A., Datsiuk O. O., Moroz L. V. Khudozhnya biohrafiya: problemy teoriyi ta istoriyi [Novelized Biography: problems of Theory and of History] Rivne, 1999, 94 p. (in Ukrainian).

Datsyuk O. O. Osoblyvosti zhanrovoyi evolyutsiyi suchasnoyi khudozhn'oyi biohrafiyi [Peculiarity of the Genre Evolution of the Modern Fiction]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Ukrainian literature). Rivne State Pedagogical University. Rivne, 1997, 16 p. (in Ukrainian).

Moroz L. V. Ob'yektyvne i sub'yektyvne u zhanri literaturnoyi biohrafiyi [Objective and Subjective in the Fiction]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Literary theory). Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kyiv, 2000, 16 p. (in Ukrainian).

Tsyapa A. Byohrafyya i avtobiohrafiya: dialoh pro nayvyshchu instantsiyu (na materiali tvoriv U. Samchuka ta E. Kanetti) [Biography and Autobiography: Dialog about the Higher Authority (U. Samchuk and E. Kanetti novels)]. Slovo i chas, 2006, no. 7, pp. 35–40. (in Ukrainian).

Amossy R. Éthos [Ethos]. In: Le dictionnaire du littéraire. Paris, 2010, рp. 209–210. (in French).

Bourdieu P. L’Illusion biographique [The Biographical Illusion]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1986, no. 62–63, pp. 69–72. (in French).

Buisine A. Biofictions [The Biographical Fictions]. Revues des Sciences Humaines. Le Biographique, 1991, no. 224, pp. 7–13. (in French).

Cohn D. Le propre de la fiction [Fiction’s Peculiarity]. Paris, 2001, 262 p. (in French).

Genette G. Fiction et diction [Fiction and Diction]. Paris, 2004, 236 p. (in French).

Hamburger K. Logique des genres littéraires [Logic of the Literary Genres]. Paris, 1986, 312 p. (in French)/.

Lejeune P. Le Pacte autobiographique [Autobiographical Pact]. Paris, 1975, 357 p. (in French).

Madelénat D. La biographie [The Biography]. Paris, 1984, 222 p. (in French).

Madelénat D. Biographie et roman: je t’aime, je te hais Le Biographique [Biography and Noval : I love you and I hate you Biographical]. In: Revue des sciences humaines, 1991, no. 224, pp. 235–247. (in French).

Regard F. Les mots de la vie : introduction à une analyse du biographique [The Word of the life : Introduction to the analyses of the Biographical]. In : La biographie littéraire en Angleterre (XVII‑XX siècles). Configurations, reconfigurations du soi artistique. Saint-Étienne, 1999, pp. 11–30. (in French).

Viart D. Essais-fictions: les biographies (ré)inventées [Essais-fictions : (re) invented biographes]. In : L'éclatement des genres au XXe siècle. Paris, 2001, pp. 331–345. (in French).

Viart D. Dis-moi qui te hante. Paradoxes du biographique [Tell me Who Hate you. Paradoxes of the Biographical]. Revue des sciences humaines, 2001, no. 263, pp. 7–33. (in French).


GOST Style Citations


Бахтін М. Проблема тексту у лінгвістиці, філології та інших гуманітарних науках / Михайло Бахтін // Слово. Знак. Дискурс. Антологія світової літературно-критичної думки ХХ ст. / за ред. М. Зубрицької. – Львів : Літопис, 1996. – C. 318–323.

 

Галич О. А. Художня біографія : проблеми теорії та історії / О. А. Галич, О. О. Дацюк, Л. В. Мороз. – Рівне, 1999. – 94 с.

 

Дацюк О. О. Особливості жанрової еволюції сучасної художньої біографії : автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня канд. філол. наук : спец. 10.01.01 „Українська література” / О. О. Дацюк. – Рівне, 1997. – 16 с.

 

Мороз Л. В. Об’єктивне і суб’єктивне у жанрі літературної біографії : автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня канд. філол. наук : спец.10.01.06 „Теорія літератури” / Л. В. Мороз. – Київ, 2000. – 16 с.

 

Цяпа А. Біографія і автобіографія: діалог про найвищу інстанцію (на матеріалі творів У. Самчука та Е. Канетті) / Андрій Цяпа // Слово і час : науковий журнал. – Липень 2006 . – Вип. 7 . – С. 35–40.

 

Amossy R. Éthos / Ruth Amossy // Le dictionnaire du littéraire / [dirs P. Aron, D. St-Jacques et A. Viala]. – Paris : Presses Universitaires de France. – 2002. – P. 209–210.

 

Bourdieu P. L’Illusion biographique / Pierre Bourdieu // Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. – 1986. – № 62–63. – P. 69–72.

 

Buisine A. Biofictions / Alain Buisine // Revues des Sciences Humaines. Le Biographique. – 1991. – № 224. – P. 7–13.

 

Cohn D. Le propre de la fiction / Dorrit Cohn. – Paris : Seuil, 2001. – 262 p.

 

Genette G. Fiction et diction / Gérard Genette. – Paris : Seuil, 2004. – 236 p.

 

Hamburger K. Logique des genres littéraires / Käte Hamburger. – Paris : Seuil, 1986. – 312 p.

 

Lejeune P. Le Pacte autobiographique / Philippe Lejeune. – Paris : Seuil, 1975. – 357 p.

 

Madelénat D. La biographie / Daniel Madelénat. – Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 1984. – 222 p.

 

Madelénat D. Biographie et roman: je t’aime, je te hais Le Biographique / Daniel Madelénat // Revue des sciences humaines. – Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 1991. – № 224. – Р. 235–247.

 

Regard F. Les mots de la vie : introduction à une analyse du biographique / Frédéric Regard // La biographie littéraire en Angleterre (XVII–XX siècles). Configurations, reconfigurations du soi artistique. – Saint-Étienne : Publications de l'université de Saint-Étienne, 1999. – Р. 11–30.

 

Viart D. Essais-fictions: les biographies (ré)inventées / Dominique Viart // L’éclatement des genres au XXe siècle / [dir. MarcDambre et Monique Gosselin-Noat]. – Paris : Presses de la Sorbonne-Nouvelle, 2001. – Р. 331–345.

 

Viart D. Dis-moi qui te hante. Paradoxes du biographique / Dominique Viart // Revue des sciences humaines. – 2001. – № 263. – P. 7–33.



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal publishes research papers on terms: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 

 

Pytannia literaturoznavstva
ISSN 2306-2908 
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
2 Kotsiubynsky str., Chernivtsi 58012, Ukraine