East-Central European and East European Neoclassicism as a Part of European Late Modernism

Authors

  • Melanie Foik University of Münster, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2013.87.118

Keywords:

neoclassicism, Kievan Neoclassicists, Skamander, Acmeist poets, modernism, late modernism

Abstract

Classicism in general, and the one of the 20th century in particular, are often characterized as a timeless and universal style and as a return to cultural tradition. Therefore it is considered to be a circular tendency in literature. The neoclassicism of the 1920s and 30s is often linked to the tradition of classicism. Although an undoubtedly important method to localize this phenomenon, such a linkage however leaves a number of questions unanswered. By taking an additional synchronous perspective of analysis (without losing the diachronic one) it is possible, to classify neoclassical tendencies as a distinct product of a certain epoch and, afterwards, to outline them at the intercept point of the two time axes.

Synchronic consideration, however, entails the problem, that neoclassicism is neither a trend of classic modernism, nor a hovering counterbalance to avant-garde. As an appropriate solution to this problem one might resort to a four-membered model of modernist movement, which supplements the trichotomy of classic modernism – avant-garde – postmodernism with an additional paradigm of late modernism. In spite of all contingencies, a comparative analysis of neighboring East-European literatures from Poland, Russia and Ukraine allows to find basic common ground, which categorizes neoclassicism both as a general European phenomenon and as a part of European late modernism.

Author Biography

Melanie Foik, University of Münster

Slavic-Baltic Department University of Münster Bispinghof 3A, 48143 Münster, Germany

References

Nalyvaiko D. S. Ukraïns′ki neoklasyky i klasytsyzm. In: Teoriia literatury i komparatyvistyka. Kyïv, 2006, pp. 322–337. (in Ukrainian).

Pavlychko S. Dyskurs modernizmu v ukraïns′kiĭ literaturi. Kyïv, 444 p. (in Ukrainian).

Blickle P. Das Alte Europa. Vom Hochmittelalter bis zur Moderne. München, 2008, 320 p.

Bürger P. Theorie der Avantgarde. Frankfurt am Main, 1974, 146 p.

Buttlar A. Der Klassizismus – ein ästhetisches Markenzeichen Europas. In: Europäische Erinnerungsorte. München, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 151–160.

Delaperrière M. Klasycyzm polski w perspektywie europejskiej – wiek XX i XXI. In: Klasycyzm. Estetyka – doktryna literacka – antropologia. Warszawa, 2009, pp. 583–602.

Drehsen V., Sparn W. Kulturkrise und Konstruktionsgeist. In: Vom Weltbildwandel zur Weltanschauungsanalyse. Krisenwahrnehmung und Krisenbewältigung um 1900. Berlin, 1996, pp. 11–29.

Eshelman R. Nikolaj Gumilev and Neoclassical Modernism. Frankfurt am Main, 1993, 160 p.

Gadamer H. G. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen, 1975, 334 p.

Kliems A., Raßloff U., Zajac P. Spätmoderne. Lyrik des 20. Jahrhunderts in Ost-Mittel-Europa I. Berlin, 2006, 444 p.

Kulcsár-Szabó E., Szegedy-Maszák M. Subjekt und Sprachlichkeit. Das „spätmoderne” Paradigma und Umrisse einer integrativen Geschichte der literarischen Moderne. In: Epoche – Text – Medialität: Diskurs der Moderne in der ungarischen Literaturwissenschaft. Tübingen, 1999, pp. 51–74.

Lam A. Die literarische Avantgarde in Polen / A. Lam. – Tübingen : Gunter Narr, 1990. – 353 p.

Lotman J. M. Kultur und Explosion. Frankfurt am Main, 2010, 259 p.

Lübbe H. Fortschrittsreaktionen. Über konservative und destruktive Modernität. Graz, 1987, 220 p.

Rymkiewicz J. M. Czym jest klasycyzm. Manifesty poetyckie. Warszawa, 1967, 181 p.

Schnädelbach H. Gescheiterte Moderne? In: Zur Rehabilitierung des animal rationale. Vorträge und Abhandlungen 2. Frankfurt am Main, 1992, 448 p.

Stollberg-Rilinger B. Rezension zu: Peter Blickle: Das Alte Europa. Vom Hochmittelalter bis zur Moderne. München 2008. In: H-Soz-u-Kult, 16.09.2008. Available at: http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/rezensionen/2008-3-165 (accessed 7 October 2012).

Published

2013-09-03

How to Cite

Foik, M. “East-Central European and East European Neoclassicism As a Part of European Late Modernism”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 87, Sept. 2013, pp. 118-2, doi:10.31861/pytlit2013.87.118.

Issue

Section

Historical Poetics