The Category of Intrigue in Contemporary Narratology

Authors

  • Valerij Tiupa Russian State University for the Humanities

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2013.87.064

Keywords:

intrigue, intrigue of revelation, liminal intrigue, narrative, plot, readerly engagement

Abstract

The article considers Paul Ricoeur’s innovative investigation of the category “narrative intrigue”. An attempt at translating the term from the language of philosophical generalizations into the language of theory of literature is made. Ricoeur’s attention is focused on the correlation of the plot and readerly reception, i.e. on the “event of telling” as an aspect of the plot. An intrigue as fundemental interest of narration is tension in a row of events that triggers certain receptive expectations and presupposes a certain satisfaction of these expectations. Organizing readerly reception, a narrative intrigue interrupts a story and unites its fractal episodes into one utterance. These multidirectional actions are inavoidable because the time of telling and “the told time” are not only unequal but different in terms of quality. The time of story is multidimensional and continuous, while the speech discourse is one-dimensional and discontinuous. A narrative intrigue in the text is a system of episodes whose boundaries indicate a fractal break of the narrated world: temporal, spacious or actantial, or two or three simulnaneous breaks. A chain of these elements of turning the story into an intrigue becomes a certain system characterized by a logic of increases or decreases; recurrent alternations, repetitions or similarities; contrast. Some episodes take up the marked positions: initial, final, central or the position of “golden ratio”. The article views the cyclical, liminal and cumulative plot schemes as already known in literary theory types of the plot. A possibility of existence of one more narrative intrigue, the intrigue of revelation, is also indicated.

Author Biography

Valerij Tiupa, Russian State University for the Humanities

Department of Theoretical and Historical Poetics Russian State University for the Humanities Miusskaya sq. 6, 125993, Moscow, Russia

References

Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Questions of Literature and Aesthetics]. Moscow, 1975, 504 p. (in Russian).

Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow, 1979, 424 p. (in Russian).

Broitman S. N. Istoricheskaia poetika [Historical Poetics]. Moscow, 2001, 320 p. (in Russian).

Grintser P. A. Drevneindiiskii epos: Genezis i tipologiia [The Acient Indian Epics: Genesis and Typology]. Moscow, 1974, 422 p. (in Russian).

Genette G. Raboty po poetike. Figury [Works on Poetics. Figures]. Moscow, vols. 1–2, 1998. (in Russian).

Zelinskii F. Iz zhizni idei [From the Life of Ideas]. Petrograd, 1916, 465 p. (in Russian).

Mandel'shtam O. E. Slovo i kul'tura [Word and Culture]. Moscow, 1987, 320 p. (in Russian).

Pospelov G. N. Problemy literaturnogo stilia [Problems of Literary Style]. Moscow, 1970, 330 p. (in Russian).

Propp V. Ia. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki [Historical Roots of the Fairy Tale]. Leningrad, 1986, 364 p. (in Russian).

Propp V. Ia. Kumuliativnaia skazka [Cumulative Fairy Tale]. In: Fol'klor i deistvitel'nost'. Moscow, 1976, pp. 241–257. (in Russian).

Ricoeur P. Vremia i rasskaz [Time and Narrative]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, vols.1–2, 2000. (in Russian).

Tamarchenko N. D. Russkii klassicheskii roman XIX veka: Problemy poetiki i tipologii zhanra [Russian Classic Novel of the 19th century: Problems of Poetics and Genre Typology]. Moscow, 1997, 202 p. (in Russian).

Tamarchenko N. D. Struktura proizvedeniia [Structure of the Literary Work]. In: Teoriia literatury. Moscow, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 172–263. (in Russian).

Tamarchenko N. D. Tipologiia realisticheskogo romana [Realistic Novel Typology]. Krasnoyarsk, 1988, 195 p. (in Russian).

Tolstoi L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete set of works]. Moscow, vols. 1–90, 1928–1958. (in Russian).

Turner V. Simvol i ritual [Symbol and Ritual]. Moscow, 1983, 277 p. (in Russian).

Tiupa V. I. Fazy mirovogo arkheosiuzheta kak istoricheskoe iadro slovaria motivov [Phases of World Archaeoplot as a Historical Centre of the Motive Dictionary]. In: Ot siuzheta k motivu. Novosibirsk, 1996, pp. 16–23. (in Russian).

Freidenberg O. M. Poetika siuzheta i zhanra [Poetics of Plot and Genre]. Moscow, 1997, 448 p. (in Russian).

Frazer J. G. Zolotaia vetv' [The Golden Bough]. Moscow, 832 p. (in Russian).

Khalizev V. E. Teoriia literatury [Theory of Literature]. Moscow, 2009, 432 p. (in Russian).

Shmid W. Narratologiia [Narratology]. Moscow, 2008, 304 p. (in Russian).

Auden W. H. The Guilty Vicarage. – Available at : http://harpers.org/archive/1948/05/the-guilty-vicarage/ (accessed 17 January 2013).

Danto A. C. Analytical Philosophy of History. Cambridge, 1965, 318 p.

Frye N. The Anatomy of Criticism. Four Essays. Princeton, 1957, 383 p.

Iser W. Der implizite Leser: Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett. Münhen, 1972, 420 S.

Ricœur P. Temps et récit. Tomes 1, 2 et 3. Paris, 1983–1985.

Veyne P. Comment on écrit l’histoire. Paris, 1971, 349 p.

White H. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, 1973, 448 p.

Published

2013-09-03

How to Cite

Tiupa, V. “The Category of Intrigue in Contemporary Narratology”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 87, Sept. 2013, pp. 64-76, doi:10.31861/pytlit2013.87.064.

Issue

Section

Poetics