“Creative Autobiography” as a Chronicle of the Formation of the Writer’s Personality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2025.111.035Keywords:
“creative autobiography”, writer’s creative individuality, self-identity, megatext, autobiographical synergism, Olha Kobylianska, diaryAbstract
The author considers the tools available in the terminological discourse for tracing the development of the writer’s creative personality – the categories of author’s subjectivity and individuality, writer’s identity (H. Syvokin), autobiographical synergism (K. Dub), megatext (S. Mykhyda), intertextuality, individual style of the author, the need for a comprehensive study of the entire corpus of the writer’s autodocumentary works in its relationship with both literary creativity and the writer’s real life is emphasized. The term “creative autobiography” is proposed to denote the history or chronicle of the writer’s creative formation, which depends on his psychological traits, lecture, environment, but is provided for reading from diaries, letters, autobiographies, memoirs. On the example of O. Kobylianska’s work, the author analyzes that these tools can be used to study the relationship between autobiographical and fiction by the same author and reflect a change of views, ways of processing autobiographical material for introduction into a fiction text, work on improving the author’s language skills, etc. It is concluded that the peculiarities of the writer’s “creative autobiography” are the dependence of self-awareness and growth as an artist on life circumstances and feelings, but autobiographies show that O. Kobylianska overestimated this dependence in her adulthood; intertextual manifestations through direct and indirect quotation, endowing characters with her own habit of keeping a diary; switching and mixing of language codes due to polylingualism; attempts in autobiographies to emphasise the development of her own talent from a different perspective than it appeared in her diary. Personal themes and motifs, such as fascination with nature, reading, horseback riding, music and painting, peculiarities of everyday life, life experiences, which began in the diary, influenced the further development of the writer’s talent, determined the plot and figurative solutions of future works.
References
Bilous, P. (2011). Vstup do literaturoznavstva [Introduction to literary criticism]. Kyiv : Akademiia, 336 p. (in Ukrainian).
Horban, A. (2006). Avtors’ka subiektyvnist’ iak strukturna model’ khudozhn’oho tekstu [Authorial subjectivity as a structural model of a literary text]. Visnyk Zhytomyrs’koho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, no. 26, pp. 113–116.
Hromyak, R., Kovaliv, Y. and Teremko, V. (ed.) (2007). Literaturoznavchyi slovnyk-dovidnyk [A literary reference dictionary]. Kyiv : Akademiia, 751 p. (in Ukrainian).
Dub, K. (2001). Avtobiohrafichnyi synerhen [Autobiographical synergism]. Slovo i Chas, no. 4, pp. 15–23.
Yevshan, M. (1998). Krytyka. Literaturoznavstvo. Estetyka [Criticism. Literary criticism. Aesthetics]. Kyiv : Osnovy, 658 p. (in Ukrainian).
Kobylianska, O. (2022). Zibrannia tvoriv [Works]. In 10 vols. Chernivtsi : Bukrek, vol. 9, 392 p. (in Ukrainian).
Kovalets, L. (2011). Yurii Fed’kovych: Istoriia rozvytku tvorchoï indyvidual’nosti pys’mennyka [Yuriy Fedkovych: The History of the Development of the Writer’s Creative Personality]. Kyiv : VTs “Akademiia”, 440 p. (in Ukrainian).
Koloshuk, N. (2021). Nefiktsiina proza [Nonfictional prose]. Kyiv : Karavela, 332 p. (in Ukrainian).
Martynchuk, K. (2022). Indyvidual’no avtors’kyi styl’ pys’mennyka literaturoznavchyi ta linhvistychnyi aspekty [The individual author’s style of the writer’s literary and linguistic aspects]. Suchasni filolohichni doslidzhennia ta navchannia inozemnoï movy v konteksti mizhkulturnoï komunikatsiï. Collection of student’s scientific papers, pp. 163–168. (in Ukrainian).
Matsiak, O. (2006). Syntez mystetstv u prozi Ol’hy Kobylians’koï: problema samototozhnosti pysmennytsi [The Synthesis of Arts in Olha Kobylianska’s Prose: The Problem of the Writer’s Identity]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 20 p. (in Ukrainian).
Mykhyda, S. (2006). Mehatekst i osobystist’ pys’mennyka [Megatext and the writer’s personality]. Visnyk Zhytomyrs’koho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, no. 26, pp. 58–62. (in Ukrainian).
Palinska, O. (2004). Vplyv semilinhvalizmu na formuvannia osobystosti Ol’hy Kobylians’koï [The Influence of Semilingualism on the Formation of Olha Kobylianska’s Personality]. Visnyk L’vivs’koho universytetu. Seriia filolohichna, iss. 33, part 2, pp. 214–218. (in Ukrainian).
Palinska, O. (2010). Zmishuvannia movnykh kodiv v idiolekti Ol’hy Kobylians’koï [Mixing language codes in the idiolect of Olha Kobylianska]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia “Filolohichna”, iss. 16, pp. 251–258. (in Ukrainian).
Pastukh, T. (2020). Stratehiï memuarnoï ta mandrivnoï literatur zakhidnoukraïns’kykh pys’mennykiv druhoï polovyny XIX ‒ pershoï polovyny XX stolittia. Lviv : Instytut ukraïnoznavstva im. I. Krypiakevycha, 572 p. (in Ukrainian).
Syvokin, H. (ed.) (1999). Samototozhnist’ pys’mennyka. Do metodolohiï suchasnoho literaturoznavstva [The identity of the writer. On the methodology of modern literary studies]. Kyiv : Ukraïns’ka knyha, 157 p. (in Ukrainian).
Stakhniuk, N. (2012). “Shchodennyky” Stefana Zheroms’koho u konteksti ioho tvorchosti: intertekstual’nyi aspekt [Stefan Jeromski’s “Diaries” in the Context of His Work: Intertextual Aspect]. Kyïvs’ki polonistychni studiï. vol. 19, pp. 325–331. (in Ukrainian).
Fashchenko, V. (2005). U hlybynakh liuds’koho buttia. Odesa : Maiak, 2005, 639 p. (in Ukrainian).
Franko, I. (1981). Zibrannia tvoriv [Works]. In 50 vols. Kyiv : Naukova dumka, vol. 31, 595 p. (in Ukrainian).
Khrapchenko, M. (1976). Tvorcha indyvidualnist’ pys’mennyka i rozvytok literatury [The creative individuality of the writer and the development of literature]. Kyiv : Dnipro, 376 p. (in Ukrainian).
Tsiupiak, I. (2013). Ukraïns’ka novela 20–80-kh rokiv XX stolittia v konteksti suchasnykh interpretatsii [The Ukrainian Short Story of the 20–80s of the Twentieth Century in the Context of Modern Interpretations]. Dnipropetrovsk : Natsional’nyi hirnychyi universytet, 198 p. (in Ukrainian).
Cherkashyna, T. (2014). Memuarno-avtobiohrafichna proza XX stolittia ukraïns’ka viziia [Memoir and Autobiographical Prose of the Twentieth Century Ukrainian Vision]. Kharkiv : Fakt, 380 p. (in Ukrainian).
Shevtsiv, H. (2012). Deiaki aspekty terminolohichnoï problematyky memuarno-avtobiohrafichnoho zhanru [Some aspects of terminological issues of the memoir-autobiography genre]. Naukovyi visnyk Pivdennoukraïns’koho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu im. K. D. Ushyns’koho. Linhvistychni nauky, no. 15, pp. 216–223. (in Ukrainian).
Jelinek, E. C. (1986). The Tradition of Women’s Autobiography: From Antiquity to the Present. Boston : Twayne Publishers, 242 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Настасія Івончак
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
