Bertolt Brecht’s Idea of Collective Creativity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2023.108.097

Keywords:

author, originality, collective creativity, craft, plagiarism, a work in progress, intermediality, Bertolt Brecht, “Brecht machine”

Abstract

The most recent research in the theory of authorship has been used to put forward an original idea about the collective creativity of the German poet and playwright Bertolt Brecht (1898–1956). It is stated that according to Bertolt Brecht scholars, there still does not exist a definition for the “collective creative work process” (Nadia Dimassi). At the same time, Brecht never concealed his creative principle, highlighting in his theoretical texts how important collective creative collaboration was for his work. Moreover, this specific principle is particularly important for understanding the creative phenomenon of the talented German artist. It is established that the concept of collective artistic creation manifests modernist qualities in his creativity, namely lyrics. Brecht believed that one isolated artist’s depiction of the modern world in its extraordinary complexity was insufficient and dubious. It has been established that Brecht’s concept of collective creation developed in several directions: throughout his life, his creative work involved friends and peers whose knowledge and skills he particularly valued, including his numerous beloved women. The artist was, thus, convinced that art was a collective affair. In addition, it is known that Brecht did not consider creative texts as being complete. For him, they were temporary versions in a constant state of creation. A particular moment of development came with their staging. Brecht had a particular attitude towards existing literary material – he believed he was a craftsman as far as texts were considered, so he developed his own “poetics of plagiarism”. A comparison with “Wagner’s total work of art” revealed intermedial aspects of artistic products created by Bertolt Brecht. The artistic specificity of the “Brecht machine” has been summarized, and the principles of its operation have been identified.

Author Biography

Svitlana Macenka, Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка

Department of German Philology

Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

1 Universytetska St., 79000, Lviv, Ukraine

References

Benjamin, W. (1977). Der Autor als Produzent. In: Benjamin, W. Gesammelte Schriften. Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp, S. 683–701.

Brecht, B. (1967). Das epische Theater. In: Brecht, B. Gesammelte Werke 15. Schriftenh zum Theater I. Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp, S. 262–272.

Brecht, B. (1991). Werke. Bd. 24. Schriften 4. Texte zu Stücken. Berlin, Weimar, Frankfurt am Main : Aufbau-Verlag, Suhrkamp, 605 S.

Brecht, B. (1992). Werke. Bd. 21. Schriften I. Berlin, Weimar, Frankfurt am Main : Aufbau-Verlag, Suhrkamp, 821 S.

Brecht, B. (1994a). Werke. Bd. 25. Schriften 5. Berlin, Weimar, Frankfurt am Main : Aufbau-Verlag, Suhrkamp, 650 S.

Brecht, B. (1994b). Werke. Bd. 26. Journale I. Berlin, Weimar, Frankfurt am Main : Aufbau-Verlag, Suhrkamp, 687 S.

Brecht, B. (1995). Werke. Bd. 18. Prosa 3. Sammlungen und Dialoge. Berlin, Weimar, Frankfurt am Main : Aufbau-Verlag, Suhrkamp, 696 S.

Delabar, W. (2001). Brechts Factory. Zur literarischen Produktion im Zeitalter der industriellen Arbeitsteilung. In: Plachta, B. (Hr.). Literarische Zusammenarbeit. Tübingen : Max Niemeyer, S. 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918472.257

Dimassi, N. (2006). Gruppenbild mit Autor oder Teamkreativität bei Bertolt Brecht. Berlin : dissertation.de, 280 S.

Ehrmann, D. und Traupmann, Th. (Hg.) (2021). Kollektives Schreiben. Paderborn : Wilhelm Fink, 283 S.

Esslin, M. (1998). Brecht and the ironies of creativity. Communications from the International Brecht Society, vol. 27, no. I, pp. 38–44.

Feuchtwanger, L. (1956). Centrum opuscula. Ein Auswahl. Rodolstadt : Greifenverlag, 644 S.

Hakkarainen, M.-L. (1944). Turnier der Texte. Stellenwert und Funktion der Intertextualität im Werk Bertolt Brechts. Frankfurt am Main : Peter Lang, 392 S.

Hauptmann, E. (1968). Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeit bei Brecht. Theater der Zeit, Heft 23, S. 7.

Hauptmann, E. (1977). Julia ohne Romeo. Geschichten, Stücken, Aufsätze, Erinnerungen. Berlin, Weimar : Aufbau-Verlag, 252 S.

Kebir, S. (1997). Ich frage nicht mehr nach meinem Anteil. Elisabeth Hauptmanns Arbeit mit Bertolt Brecht. Berlin : Aufbau, 292 S.

Kerr, A. (1981). Mit Schleuder und Harfe: Theaterkritiken aus drei Jahrzehnten. Berlin : Severin und Siedler, 668 S.

Kittstein, U. (2012). Das lyrische Werk Bertolt Brechts. Stuttgart, Weimar : J. B. Metzler, 378 S. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05340-4

Pabst, S. und Penke, N. (2022). Kollektive Autorschaft. In: Wetzel, M. (Hr.). Grundthemen der Literaturwissenschaft. Autorschaft. Berlin, Boston : De Gruyter, S. 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110297065-015

Seidel, G. (1977). Bertolt Brecht – Arbeitsweise und Edition. Das literarische Werk als Prozess. Stuttgart : Akademie-Verlag, 364 S.

Wetzel, M. (Hr.) (2022). Grundthemen der Literaturwissenschaft. Autorschaft. Berlin, Boston : De Gruyter, 645 S. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110297065

Zielke, E. (2022). Im Dickicht des Schaffens. Kunst und Kollektiv: Lernen von der Brecht-Maschine. In: nd.Aktuell.de. URL: https://www.nd-aktuell.de/artikel/1165908.bertolt-brecht-im-dickicht-des-schaffens.html (accessed: 15.05.2023).

Zuckmayer, C. (1966). „Als wär’s ein Stück von mir“. Horen der Freundschaft. Frankfurt am Main : S. Fischer, 704 S.

Published

2023-12-29 — Updated on 2023-12-29

How to Cite

Macenka, S. “Bertolt Brecht’s Idea of Collective Creativity”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 108, Dec. 2023, pp. 97-111, doi:10.31861/pytlit2023.108.097.

Issue

Section

Poetics. Historical Poetics