Hryhoriy Skovoroda’s Idea of Related Work in the Poetry of the Modernist Association “Muzaget”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2022.106.025

Keywords:

Hryhoriy Skovoroda, related work, “Muzaget”, conceptual dominant, Ukrainian modernism, modernist poetry

Abstract

Hryhoriy Skovoroda’s idea of the immanent existence (1722–1794) about related work in Ukrainian modernists poetry, in particular representatives of the artistic group “Muzaget” (1919) is considered as the main methodological prism that conceptualize related work of Panna, outlined with the support of V. Gorsky, L. Ushkalov, and D. Chyzhevsky. The article describes the history of creation and specifics of Kyiv post-revolutionary group of symbolists “Muzaget” activities. The literary and artistic almanac with a similar name was analyzed, where each member of the collective presented his “related” art form: poetry, prose, criticism, painting and, at the same time, recorded the affinity of individual and social (national) principles. Based on the analysis of Mykhailo Zhuk, Dmytro Zahul, Volodymyr Kobylyansky, Klym Polishchuk, Oleksa Slisarenko, Mykola Tereshchenko, Pavlo Tychyna, Pavlo Fylypovych, and Volodymyr Yaroshenko poetry, conceptual dominants have been singled out, which in general realize the creative and collective affinity of “Muzaget poetry”. The symbolism of poetic images-archetypes is outlined: God, Christ, joy, star, flower, wind, path, poet’s soul, singing, music, and dream. The functioning of antitheses and parallelisms is emphasized: the flow of human life / the impermanence of nature, life / death, earth / hell / heaven, good / evil, day / night, asceticism / holiness / sinfulness, Christ / Satan, loneliness / crowd. The polyphonic musical imagery and musicality of the poem are analyzed by using tropes, phonetic and syntactic means. It is concluded that poetic innovation, truthful exhibition of creativity and individuality, accentuation of affinity between talent and character, productive interaction of friends in popular creative collectives in the conditions and under the influence of complex historical events and ideological dilemmas of the 20-30s of the 20th century, led some Musagetists to glorious recognition, and others to the tragic consequences of the Red Renaissance.

Author Biography

Alyona Tychinina, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

Department of World Literature and Theory of Literature

Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

2 Kotsiubynsky str., 58002, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

References

Ageyeva, V. (2017). KhLAM ta “L′okh mystetstv”: kul′turne zhyttia Kyieva 100 rokiv tomu [HLAM and the “Cellar of Arts”: the cultural life of Kyiv 100 years ago]. BBC News Ukraïna, 20 April. (in Ukrainian). URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/blogs-39504827 (accessed: 1.12.2022).

Horsky, V. (1996). Hryhorii Skovoroda iak typ ukraïns′koho intelihenta [Hryhoriy Skovoroda as a type of Ukrainian intellectual]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Filosofiia ta relihiieznavstvo, vol. 1. pp. 65–71. (in Ukrainian).

Zhurba, H. (1990). Vid “Ukraïns′koï khaty” do “Muzahetu” [From “Ukrainian House” to “Muzaget”]. Ukraïna, no. 47, p. 135–137. (in Ukrainian).

Kovaliv, Yu. (2020). Muzahet [Muzaget]. In: Dziuba, I., Zhukovsky, A., Zhelezniak, M. and oth. (ed.). Entsyklopediia suchasnoï Ukraïny. Kyiv : Instytut entsyklopedychnykh doslidzhen′ NAN Ukraïny, vol. 22. (in Ukrainian). URL: https://esu.com.ua/article-69841 (accessed: 1.12.2022).

Lavrinenko, Yu. (1977) Na shliakhakh syntezy kliarnetyzmu [On the way to the synthesis of clarinetism]. New York : Suchasnist′, 64 p. (in Ukrainian).

Muzahet [Musaget] (1919). Kyiv : Siaivo, no. 1–3 (January-February-March) 168 p. (in Ukrainian).

Rybakov, M. (2010). Muzahet [Musaget]. In: Smoliy, V. and oth. (ed.) Entsyklopediia istoriï Ukraïny. Vol. 7: Ml-O. Kyiv : Naukova dumka, p. 102. (in Ukrainian).

Rybchynska, Z. (2008). Symvol iak “tekstova stratehiia”: poeziia Iakova Savchenka v konteksti estetychnykh poshukiv “Muzagetu” [Symbol as a “textual strategy”: Yakov Savchenko’s poetry in the context of the aesthetic searches of “Muzaget”]. Visnyk L′vivs′koho natsional′noho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Seriia filolohichna, iss. 44, part 2, pp. 276–287. (in Ukrainian).

Skovoroda, H. (1994). Tvory. U 2 t. [Works. In 2 vols.] Kyiv : Oberehy, vol. 1, 528 p. (in Ukrainian).

Ushkalov, L. (2004). Hryhorii Skovoroda: seminarii [Hryhoriy Skovoroda: seminary]. Kharkiv : Maidan, 776 p. (in Ukrainian).

Chervinska, O. (2018). Kreatyv nevyznachenosti: poetychnyi tekst cherez sto rokiv [Creativity of Uncertainty: A Poetic Text in One Hundred Years]. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 98, pp. 23–40. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2018.98.023

Chyzhevsky, D. (1992). Narysy z istoriï filosofiï na Ukraïni [Essays on the history of philosophy in Ukraine]. Kyiv : Orii, 230 (in Ukrainian).

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Tychinina, A. “Hryhoriy Skovoroda’s Idea of Related Work in the Poetry of the Modernist Association ‘Muzaget’”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 106, Dec. 2022, pp. 25-40, doi:10.31861/pytlit2022.106.025.

Issue

Section

Anniversaries