“Iris” (2001) by Richard Eyre: Film Reception Specificity of the Writer’s Biography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2022.105.094Keywords:
biopic, memoirs, film reception, Iris Murdoch, Richard Eyre, “Iris”Abstract
The article analyses the film reception issues of I. Murdoch’s biography in epistemological and historiographical perspectives. Due to the productive interaction of different types of biographical works, the mechanism of presentation / perception / cognition is mainly realized through references and reflection as an individual ability to supplement the “truth” of factual biographical material with other relations such as “interpretability”, “realizability” that form the so-called cognitive complex related to the perception peculiarities of biopic both as a separate genre and in the context of other biographical genres: memoirs, literary biography, etc. In the global context of biopics about writers, the film “Iris” (2001), directed by Richard Eyre, is perceived quite ambiguously. This receptive „ambiguity” is explained by the fact that R. Eyre deviates to some extent from the established canons of the biopic genre, building his plot on the contrast of two planes of relations between famous intellectuals – Bayley and Murdoch – as young, talented, charismatic, open-minded in her relationships Iris and as an elderly woman suffering from an incurable disease. Since it is almost impossible to cover her life in all its manifestations and activities in one perspective, the director resorts to intermedial dimensions and techniques of presenting biographical material. Relying on the documentary basis and memoirs of Murdoch’s husband John Bayley (“Elegy of Iris” and “Iris and Her Friends”), due to chronotopic shifts, television biography in the biopic, excerpts from Murdoch’s lectures, emphasizing her quotes scattered in the film, R. Eyre frames his model of Murdoch’s biography. This strategy allowed him, albeit fragmentarily, to show one of the world's smartest women in various guises: as a writer, as a philosopher and as an ordinary person, recreating the happiest and the most tragic fragments of her life, especially during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease.
References
Barancheeva, I. (2002). Zhizn' i liubov' Airis Merdok. Biograficheskii ocherk [Life and Love of Iris Murdoch]. Literaturnaia gazeta. (in Russian). URL: http://www.pergam-club.ru/book/5872 (accessed: 28 April 2022).
Bakhtin, M. (1963). Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow : Sovetskii pisatel', 363 p. (in Russian).
Briukhovetska, L. (2016). Na poli kinematohrafichnomu: stsenariï Ivana Dracha [In the field of cinema: scripts by Ivan Drach]. Kyiv : Kino-Teatr, ART Knyha, 116 p. (in Ukrainian).
Leonova, E. (2002). Razum i telo [Mind and Body]. Literaturnaia gazeta. (in Russian). URL: http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/1150469/post21899308 (accessed: 5 May 2022).
Lotman, J. (1985). Biografiia – zhivoe litso [Biography – a living face]. Novyi mir, no. 2, рр. 228–236. (in Russian).
Magalashvili, Yu. (1984). Esteticheskie zakonomernosti khudozhestvennoi interpretatsii ekraniziruemykh proizvedenii iskusstva (na primere ekranizatsii proizvedenii klassicheskoi literatury) [Aesthetic patterns of artistic interpretation of screened art works (on the example of screen adaptations of classical literature works)]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Moscow State University, 32 р. (in Russian).
Todorov, Tz. (2006). Poniattia literatury ta inshi ese [The concept of literature and other essays]. Translated from the French by Ye. Marichev. Kyiv : Vyd. dim “Kyievo-Mohylians′ka akademiia”, 162 р. (in Ukrainian).
Freilikh, S. (1992). Teoriia kino: Ot Eizenshteina do Tarkovskogo [Film theory: From Eisenstein to Tarkovsky]. Moscow : Iskusstvo, 251 р. (in Russian).
Kholikov, A. (comp.) (2008). Biografiia glazami biografa (po materialam kruglogo stola) [Biography through the eyes of a biographer]. Voprosy literatury, November–December, рр. 37–39. (in Russian).
Bastin, G. (2009). Filming the Ineffable: Biopics of the British Royal Family. Auto/Biography Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, рр. 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2009.10846787
Bayley, J. (1998). Iris: A Memoir of Iris Murdoch. London : Duckworth, 192 p.
Bayley, J. (1999). Elegy for Iris. New York : Picador, 288 p.
Bayley, J. (2000). Iris and Her Friends: A Memoir of Memory and Desire. New York : W. W. Norton, 275 p.
Bradshaw, P. (2002). Iris. The Guardian, 18 January. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2002/jan/18/1 (accessed: 2 May 2022).
Coconi, A. (2014). Iris. Unsung Films, 24 December. URL: https://www.unsungfilms.com/20508/iris/#gsc.tab=0 (accessed: 2 May 2022).
Conrad, P. (2001). Who really knew Iris? The Guardian, 16 September. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2001/sep/16/biography.highereducation (accessed: 2 May 2022).
Conradi, P. (2001). Iris Murdoch: A Life. London : Harper Collins Publishers, 706 p.
Custen, G. (1992). Bio/Pics: How Hollywood Constructed Public History. New Brunswick, N.J. : Rutgers University Press, 304 p.
Eyre, R. and Wood, Ch. (2002). Iris: A Screenplay. London : Bloomsbury, 138 p.
Gittings, R. (1978). The Nature of Biography. Seattle : University of Washington Press, 96 p.
Iris (2001). Film. United Kingdom, United States. Directed by Richard Eyre.
Nussbaum, M. (2012). When She Was Good: Peter J. Conradi (2001), Iris Murdoch: A Life. In: Nussbaum, M. Philosophical Interventions: Reviews 1986–2011. New York : Oxford University Press, pр. 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199777853.003.0022
Updike, J. (2001). Young Iris. The New Yorker, 1 October. URL: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2001/10/01/young-iris (accessed: 2 May 2022).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aliona Matiychak, Nataliia Nikoriak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
