In Search of the Meaning of Umberto Eco’s Narrative Metaphor “To Catch a Orange Dove”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2020.101.256

Keywords:

Umberto Eco, “The Island of the Day Before”, metaphor “The Orange Dove”, narrative, narrative metaphor, epistemological metaphor, reception

Abstract

The narrative specifics of Umberto Eco’s novel “The Island of the Day Before is regarded through a basic idea of the narrative metaphor “The Orange Dove”. The methodological basis of the study is a summary concept of the relationship between narrative and metaphor. These are O. Freidenberg’s hypothesis of metaphor as a future narrative form of plots and genres; F. Ankersmit’s narrative logic of metaphor’s transformation into a plot through a “point of view”; P. Recoeur’s “common innovative nucleus” in narrative and metaphor designed for productive imagination; G. Genette’s “narrative modality” and regulation of narrative information through metalepsis; R. Barthes’ dichotomy of “functions and indices” as an analogy of metonymic and metaphorical relations. In the article under discussion, we consider metaphor as a narrative principle that ensures its own presentation, generates its rhythm, creates personosphere, and involves a reader in an intellectual game. Such a way of metaphor formation marks U. Eco’s literary style. In his novel “The Island of the day Before”, the following distinctive range of metaphors play a very constructive role: metaphor of sleep, metaphor of love as a source of creative activities, metaphor of duality, metaphor of hatred. Above all, it is worth pointing out author’s epistemological metaphor, which is closely related to the search of truth: in the latter sense, the “Orange Dove” is associated with a post-modernist analogue of the “Blue Rose”, borrowed from the epoch of Romanticism. Due to the technique of metalepsis (“the figure of speech denoting author’s intrusion”), offered by G. Genette, the narrator demonstrates his metaphoric intentions through the discourse of a character-narrator. In conclusion, narrative metaphor of the novel directs the narrative strategy to a variety of its numerous versions, which may be implemented owing to reader’s competence.

Author Biography

Alyona Tychinina, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

Department of World Literature, Theory of Literature and Slavic Philology

Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

2 Kotsiubynsky str., 58012, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

References

Ankersmit, F. (2003). Narrativnaia logika. Semanticheskii analiz iazyka istorikov [Narrative logic. Semantic analysis of the language of historians]. Moscow : Ideia–Press, 360 р. (in Russian).

Barthes, R. (2000). Vvedenie v strukturnyi analiz povestvovatel'nykh tekstov. Francuzskaia semiotika: Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu [An Introduction to Structural Analysis of Narrative Texts]. Moscow : IG Progress, рр. 196–238. (in Russian).

Galatenko, Y. (2011). “Ia” i moi dvoinik v romanakh U. Eko. Na primere romanov “Ostrov nakanune” i “Baudolino” [“Me” and my double in U. Eco’s novels. On the example of the novels “The Island of the Day Before” and “Baudolino”]. Saarbrücken : Lambert Academic Publishing, 133 р. (in Russian).

Eco, U. (2004). Rol′ chytacha. Doslidzhennia z semiotyky tekstiv [The role of the reader]. Lviv : Litopys, 652 р. (in Ukrainian).

Eco, U. (2016). Ostriv naperedodni [The Island of the Day Before]. Kharkiv : Folio, 412 р. (in Ukrainian).

Genette, G. (1998). Figury [Figures]. Moscow : Izd.-vo im. Sabashnikovyh, 944 р. (in Russian).

Zatonskyi, D. (2000). Modernizm i postmodernizm [Modernism and Postmodernism]. Kharkiv : Folio ; Moscow : OOO “Izdatelstvo ACT”, 256 р. (in Russian)

Lyotard, J.-F. (1998). Sostoianie postmoderna [The Postmodern Condition]. Saint Petersburg : Aleteiia, 278 р. (in Russian).

Mykhed, T. (2013). Postmodernists′ki modyfikatsii obraziv Robinzona ta Piatnytsi: holovni tendentsii ta trendy [Postmodern modifications of Robinson and P'yatnytsi images]. Literatura ta kul′tura Polissia, no. 74, pp. 153–161. (in Ukrainian).

Ortega y Gasset, J. Dve glavnye metafory [Two main metaphors]. Estetika. Filosofiia kul'tury. Moscow : Iskusstvo, pp. 203–218. (in Russian).

Ricœur, P. (1998). Vremia i rasskaz [Time and Narrative]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg : Universitetskaia kniga, 313 p. (in Russian).

Sabadash, I. (2012). Umberto Eko: humanizm kul′turotvorchykh ideĭ [Umberto Eco: the humanism of cultural ideas]. Kyiv : Natsional′na akademiia kerivnykh kadriv kul′tury i mystetstv, 156 p. (in Ukrainian).

Freidenberg, O. (1997). Poetika siuzheta i zhanra [Poetics of plot and genre]. Moscow : Labirint, 448 p. (in Russian).

Schmid, W. (2003). Narratologiia [Narratology]. Moscow : Iazyki slavianskoi kultury, 312 p. (in Russian).

Eco, U. (2004). Otkrytoe proizvedenie: Forma i neopredelennost' v sovremennoi poetike [Open text]. Saint Petersburg : Akademicheskii proekt, 384 p. (in Russian).

Еco, U. (2016). Ot dreva k labirintu. Istoricheskie issledovaniia znaka i interpretatsii [From tree to labyrinth. Historical studies of sign and interpretation]. Moscow : Akademicheskii proekt, 559 р. (in Russian).

Published

2020-07-09

How to Cite

Tychinina, A. “In Search of the Meaning of Umberto Eco’s Narrative Metaphor ‘To Catch a Orange Dove’”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 101, July 2020, pp. 256-77, doi:10.31861/pytlit2020.101.256.

Issue

Section

The Subject