Metaphor as a Literary Device of Conceptualizing Reality in Polycodic Fiction
Keywords:Steven Hall, polycodic text, compositional metaphor, non-verbal means, iconic images, conceptualization
The article highlights the problem of metaphorical thinking as a way of conceptualizing reality in Steven Hall’s fiction “The Raw Shark Texts”. The relevance of the study is due to the need to expand the analysis of the communicative features of the literary text with an iconic component. The main goal of the article is to analyze the features of the text polycoding as a form of artistic communication and to find out the role and functions of the metaphor as a means of conceptualizing reality in the polycodic text of the novel.
S. Hall makes full use of graphics possibilities in the text of his fiction, expanding the scope of the novel to a heterogeneous form, combining verbal and iconic means at the content-structure level. The combination of complex means of various semiotic systems, the inclusion of other components in the verbal structure of the text, paradoxically does not complicate its perception, but rather simplifies the understanding of the text, enriches the possibilities of its interpretation, gives the recipient more freedom for decoding.
The text-forming function of the Hall’s compositional metaphor is the ability to be expanded throughout the fiction text, indicated in chapter titles, reinforced by basic concepts (conceptual metaphors) and supported in the plot (visual metaphors, primary and creative metaphors). Reproducing the features of sensory mechanisms and their interaction with the psyche, the author was able to grasp the common between concrete objects and abstract concepts, to compare the incomparable. This approach allows us to consider the conceptual metaphor as a structural component of the novel, focusing on the specifics of the metaphorical construction of new realities. The comprehensiveness of the compositional metaphor in the novel “The Raw Shark Texts”, with all its constituents (conceptual, visual, primary and creative metaphors), its pervasiveness and the ability to reveal images within the entire fiction text gives it originality, integrity in the entirety of all its verbal and visual means.
Anisimova, E. E. (2003). Lingvistika teksta i mezhkul'turnaia kommunikatsiia (na materiale kreolizovannykh tekstov) [Text linguistics and intercultural communication (on the example of creolized texts)]. Moscow : Akademiia, 128 p. (in Russian).
Arnold, I. V. (1990). Stilistika sovremennogo angliiskogo iazyka [Stylistics of the modern English language]. Moscow : Prosveshchenie, 301 p. (in Russian).
Valgina, N. S. (2003). Poniatie kreolizovannogo teksta [The notion of a creolized text]. Teoriia teksta. Moscow : Logos, pp. 192–194. (in Russian).
Romaniukha, M. V. (2007). Osoblyvosti metaforychnoï nominatsiï v anhlomovnii finansovii terminolohiï [Peculiarities of metaphorical nomination in English financial terminology]. Visnyk SumDU. Seriia “Filolohiia”, no. 1, vol. 2, pp. 150–154. (in Ukrainian).
Sorokin, Y. A. and Tarasov, E. F. (1990). Kreolizovannye teksty i ikh kommunikativnaia funktsiia [Creolized texts and their communicative function]. Optimizatsiia rechevogo vozdeistviia. Moscow : Vysshaia shkola, pp. 180–186. (in Russian).
Srebrianskaia, N. A. (2013). Kreolizovannye khudozhestvennye teksty raznykh tipov znakovykh sistem [Creolized literary texts of different types of sign systems]. Izvestiia VGPU, no. 2 (261), pp. 213–216. (in Russian).
Kharchenko, V. K. (1992). Funktsii metafory. Lingvistika [Functions of a metaphor. Linguistics]. Voronezh : Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 86 p. (in Russian).
Cherniavskaia, V. E. (2014). Lingvistika teksta: Polikodovost', intertekstual'nost', interdiskursivnost' [Text linguistics: polycode, intertextuality, interdiscourse]. Moscow : Direkt-Media, 267 p. (in Russian).
Carrier, D. (2000). The aesthetics of comics. University Park : The Pennsylvania State University Press, 139 p
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge; New York : Cambridge University Press, 564 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. and Steen, G. J. (eds.). (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia : J. Benjamins, 225 p. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175
Hall, S. (2007). The Raw Shark Texts. New York : Canongate, 366 р. URL: http://kat.ph/the-raw-shark-texts-steve-hall-t3478465.html (accessed: 15 October 2019).
Hayles, N. K. (2012). Transcendent Data and Transmedia Narrative: Steven Hall’s “The Raw Shark Texts”. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, pp. 199–220. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London : Routledge, 312 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
Lakoff, J. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago : Chicago University Press, 242 p.
MacCormac, E. R. (1985). A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 254 p.
Madsen, M. W. (2016). Cognitive Metaphor Theory and the Metaphysics of Immediacy. Cognitive Science, no. 40 (4), pp. 881–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12320
O’Halloran, K. L. (2004). Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic-Functional Perspectives. London : Continuum, 252 p.
Panko, J. (2011). Memory Pressed Flat into Text: The Importance of Print in Steven Hall’s “The Raw Shark Texts”. Contemporary Literature, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 264–297. https://doi.org/10.1353/cli.2011.0025
Pressman, J. (2009). The Aesthetic of Bookishness in Twenty-First-Century Literature. Michigan Quarterly Review, vol. XLVIII, iss. 4: Bookishness: The New Fate of Reading in the Digital Age. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.act2080.0048.402 (accessed: 15 October 2019).
Sweeney S. Review of “The Raw Shark Texts”, Steven Hall, 2018, December 3. URL: https://seamussweeney.net/2018/12/03/review-of-the-raw-shark-texts-steven-hall/ (accessed: 15 October 2019).
Steen, G. J. (2002). Identifying Metaphor in Language: A Cognitive Approach. Style, vol. 36, no. 3: Cognitive Approaches to Figurative Language, pp. 386–406.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Aliona Matiychak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.