Monarch’s Multiple Bodies: Implementing Body Politic Metaphor on Present-Day North American Stages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2020.101.163Keywords:
metaphor, body politic, North American drama, theater, Sarah Ruhl, Timothy Findley, corporealityAbstract
The paper seeks to explore the strategies instrumental for the implementation of the body politic metaphor that had been active in Western culture since classical antiquity in the plays authored by present-day North American dramatists (Sarah Ruhl’s Passion Play, USA, 2010, and Timothy Findley’s Elizabeth Rex, Canada, 2000). Drawing upon the concept of the “king’s two bodies” (E. Plowden, E. Кantorowicz, М. Аxton, А. Мusolff, L. Montrose and other New Historicists), the author sets out to demonstrate that in S. Ruhl’s dramatic cycle the metaphor serves to indicate the inextricable links between the concepts of power, the sacred, and the theatrical, whereas Т. Findley uses it to study the ontology of sex and gender in political and theatrical contexts. It is argued that the age-old somatic metaphor conceived in the archaic layers of human psyche manifests its viable receptive potential through its efficient functioning in the early 21st century cultural artifacts.
References
Gritsanov, А. А. (2001). Telo [Body]. Postmodernizm. Entsiklopediia. Minsk : Interpresservis, pp. 826–830. (in Russian).
Klekovkin, О. Y. (2002). Sakral’nyi teatr: Heneza. Forma. Poetyka [Sacred Theater: Genesis. Form. Poetics]. Kyiv : KDITM im. I. K. Karpenka-Karoho, 270 p. (in Ukrainian).
Miller, J. (1990). Obrazy i modeli, upodobleniia i metafory [Images and Models, Similes and Metaphors]. Teoriia metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow : Progress, pp. 236–283. (in Russian).
Ortega-i-Gasset, J. (1990). Dve velikie metafory [Two Great Metaphors]. Teoriia metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow : Progress, pp. 68–82. (in Russian).
Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. 2nd edition. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 370 p. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
Axton, M. (1977). The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession. London : Royal Historical Society, 176 p.
Dobson, M. and Watson, N. (2002). England’s Elizabeth. An Afterlife in Fame and Fantasy. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 348 p.
Findley, T. (2000). Elizabeth Rex. Winnipeg : Blizzard Publishing, 79 p.
Kantorowicz, E. (1957). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 568 p.
Kuling, P. (2017). Counterfactual History at the Stratford Festival: Timothy Findley’s Elizabeth Rex and Peter Hinton’s The Swann. In: Makaryk, I., Prince, K. (eds.). Shakespeare and Canada: Remembrance of Ourselves. Ottawa : Ottawa University Press, pp. 71–78.
Lakoff, J. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago : Chicago University Press, 242 p.
Montrose, L. A. (1988). “Shaping Fantasies”: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. In: Greenblatt, St. (ed.). Representing English Renaissance. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press, pp. 31–64.
Mullaney, St. (1988). The Place of the Stage: License, Play, and Power in Renaissance England. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 178 p.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London : Bloomsbury Publishers, 208 p.
Ruhl, S. (2010). Passion Play. New York : Theatre Communications Group, 262 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Natalia Vysotska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
