DOI: https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2019.99.135

Narrative Unreliability as a Literary Device and Reception Shift

Aliona Matiychak

Abstract


The primary aim of the article is to gain a better understanding of narrative unreliability as a literary device in reception perspective. While previous studies have focused mainly on textual incongruities, argued for an encoded strategy on the part of the implied author or have embraced a reader-oriented model; the present study attempts to analyze the concept of unreliable narration as a convergence of both the rhetorical and cognitive/constructivist models in genre identification. The object of the analyses is Sarah Waters’ novel “The Little Stranger”, in particular its metamorphosed genre with the elements of historical sketch, mystery, poltergeist/ ghost story, mysticism and detective intrigue. The author’s narrative strategy is specified by the multiple readers’ responses. Despite the explicit Gothic modality, the historical context makes it possible to implement the author's conceptual intentions. Sarah Waters chooses a subjective narration type, when the homodiegetic narrator performs a dual function: both the narrator-observer and the character. In his unreliable narratives, the complementarities of misreporting, misinterpreting, underreporting and misevaluating are traced. Narrative unreliability in the novel serves as a kind of disguise for the mental aberrations of the homodiegetic narrator, so that the peculiarities of his narration cause doubts about his adequacy, freeing the reader from his influence and making it possible to create various interpretations of the story. Consequently, narrative unreliability here directly affects both the genre identification and the range of reception shift from the implicit reader to the text (implicit communication), and from interpretive frames to the implicit author and reverse, that allows to apply a convergence of rhetorical and cognitive/ constructivist methods in the novel analyses.


Keywords


Sarah Waters; narrative unreliability; homodiegetic narrator; discordance; reception; metamorphosed genre

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar A. Sarah Waters: 'Is there a poltergeist within me?' URL : http://www.independent.co.uk/sarah-waters-is-there-a-poltergeist-within-me-1692335.html (accessed 15 May 2019).

Booth W. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, 1983, 572 р.

Braid B. What Haunts Hundreds Hall? Transgression in Sarah Waters’ The Little Stranger. URL : http://www.academia.edu/263994 (accessed 15 May 2019).

Charles R. This old house. Washington Post. 2009. URL : http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/19/AR2009051903162.html?noredirect=on (accessed 15 May 2019).

Chatman, Seymour. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. London, 1978.

Chatman, Seymour. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, 1990.

Cohn, Dorrit. Discordant Narration. Style 34.2 (Jun 2000), pp. 307–316.

Fludernik M. An introduction to narratology. London and New York, 2009, 190 p.

Fludernik, Monica. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London, 1996.

Jordison S. Guardian book club: The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters. URL : https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2010/aug/11/book-club-sarah-waters-little-stranger (accessed 15 May 2019).

Mullan J. The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters. URL : https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/aug/14/little-stranger-book-club-responses (accessed 15 May 2019).

Nünning, Ansgar. Unreliable, Compared to What? Towards a Cognitive Theory of Unreliable Narration: Prolegomena and Hypotheses. In: Grenzüberschreitungen: Narratologie im Kontext/Transcending Boundaries: Narratology in Context, Walter Grünzweig and Andreas Solbach (eds). Tübingen, 1999, pp. 53–73.

Nünning, Ansgar. Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration: Synthesizing Cognitive and Rhetorical Approaches. In: A Companion to Narrative Theory, James Phelan and Peter J. Rabinowitz (eds). Malden, 2005, pp. 89–107.

Olson, Greta. Reconsidering Unreliability: Fallible and Untrustworthy Narrators. Narrative 11.1 (Jan 2003), pp. 93–109.

Phelan J. Narrative Theory, 1966–2006: A Narrative. In: The Nature of Narrative: Revised and Expanded. New York, 2006, pp. 283–336.

Shlomith, Rimmon-Kenan. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London, 2002.

Waters S. The Little Stranger. London, 2009, 512 p.

Waters S. 'I deliberately left the resolution open' URL : https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/aug/07/book-club-sarah-waters-little-stranger (accessed 15 May 2019).

Yacobi T. Fictional Reliability as a Communicative Problem. Poetics Today, 1981, vol. 2, pp. 113–126.

Yacobi T. Authorial Rhetoric, Narratorial (Un)Reliability, Divergent Readings: Tolstoy’s Kreutzer Sonata. In: A Companion to Narrative Theory, James Phelan and Peter J. Rabinowitz (eds). Malden, 2005, pp. 108–123.


GOST Style Citations


Akbar A. Sarah Waters: 'Is there a poltergeist within me?' URL : http://www.independent.co.uk/sarah-waters-is-there-a-poltergeist-within-me-1692335.html.

Booth W. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago : Un-ty of Chicago Press, 1983. 572 р.

Braid B. What Haunts Hundreds Hall? Transgression in Sarah Waters’ The Little Stranger. URL : http://www.academia.edu/263994.

Charles R. This old house. Washington Post. 2009. URL : http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/19/AR2009051903162.html?noredirect=on.

Chatman S. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. London : Cornell UP, 1978.

Chatman S. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca : Cornell UP, 1990.

Cohn D. Discordant Narration. Style 34.2 (Jun 2000). P. 307–316.

Fludernik M. An introduction to narratology. London and New York : Routledge, 2009. 190 p.

Fludernik M. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London : Routledge Books, 1996.

Jordison S. Guardian book club: The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters. URL : https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2010/aug/11/book-club-sarah-waters-little-stranger.

Mullan J. The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters. URL : https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/aug/14/little-stranger-book-club-responses.

Nünning A. “Unreliable, Compared to What? Towards a Cognitive Theory of Unreliable Narration: Prolegomena and Hypotheses.” Grenzüberschreitungen: Narratologie im Kontext/Transcending Boundaries: Narratology in Context / Walter Grünzweig and Andreas Solbach (eds). Tübingen : Gunter Narr Verlag, 1999. P. 53–73.

Nünning A. “Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration: Synthesizing Cognitive and Rhetorical Approaches.” A Companion to Narrative Theory / James Phelan and Peter J. Rabinowitz (eds). Malden : Blackwell Publishing, 2005. P. 89–107.

Olson G. “Reconsidering Unreliability: Fallible and Untrustworthy Narrators.” Narrative 11.1 (Jan 2003). P. 93–109.

Phelan J. Narrative Theory, 1966–2006: A Narrative. The Nature of Narrative: Revised and Expanded. New York : Oxford Un-ty Press, 2006. P. 283–336.

Shlomith R.-K. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. 2nd Ed. London : Routledge Books, 2002.

Waters S. The Little Stranger. London : Virago, 2009. 512 p.

Waters S. 'I deliberately left the resolution open'. URL : https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/aug/07/book-club-sarah-waters-little-stranger.

Yacobi T. Fictional Reliability as a Communicative Problem. Poetics Today. 1981. Vol. 2. P. 113–126.

Yacobi T. “Authorial Rhetoric, Narratorial (Un)Reliability, Divergent Readings: Tolstoy’s Kreutzer Sonata.” A Companion to Narrative Theory / James Phelan and Peter J. Rabinowitz (eds). Malden : Blackwell Publishing, 2005. P. 108–123.





Copyright (c) 2019 Aliona Matiychak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal publishes research papers on terms: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 

 

Pytannia literaturoznavstva
ISSN 2306-2908 
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
2 Kotsiubynsky str., Chernivtsi 58012, Ukraine