The Genre of “View” and Its Modifications: the Monographs by O. V. Bogdanova and L. G. Frizman in the Context of Monographs by E. M. Vasyliev, T. I. Hundorova, B. F. Egorov, V. B. Musiy, and Others

Authors

  • Luiza Oliander Lesia Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2018.98.342

Keywords:

association, view, dialogue, genre, discourse, narrative

Abstract

Based on the books by O. Bogdanova, L. Frizman, and others, the article under studies deals with the issue of the modifications of the genre of view due to the upgrade of scientific narrative in Russian and Ukrainian Literary Studies of the early XX century. The order of the monographs, for their genre analysis, may be substantiated by two factors: 1) the genre of view is the term, introduced by the authors – a) directly (O. Bogdanova, L. Frizman), b) the choice has been stipulated by the fact that the genre of O. Bogdanova’s and L. Frizman’s monographs is defined as view by their authors, whereas in the works by E. Vasyliev, B. Egorova, and V. Musiy its genre features are distinctly revealed as a discourse; 2) the genre of view is determined – a) by the presence of genre signs in the very discourse (E. M. Vasyliev, T. Hundorova, B. F. Egorov, I. V. Kozlyk, V. B. Musiy, A. A. Stepanova and others), b) implicitly (S. M. Koznacheev). Particular emphasis has been laid on the association of critics with human experience (M. Mamardashvili), as well as on the enhancement of personal vision that absorbs the respective experience of a generation. It is essential that, for example, T. Hundorova presents the author’s ego in the form of a philosopher comprehending the post-Chornobyl literary-philosophical world perception.

Author Biography

Luiza Oliander, Lesia Ukrainka Eastern European National University

Slavic Philology Department Lesia Ukrainka Eastern European National University Vynnychenka str., 30A, 43025, Lutsk, Ukraine

References

Bogdanova O. V. Sovremennyi vzgliad na russkuiu literaturu XIX – serediny XX vv. [Contemporary View on the Russian Literature of the XIX-Mid XX centuries]. Saint Petersburg, 2017, 560 p. (in Russian).

Burago S. B. Nabeg iazychestva na rubezhe vekov [The Paganism Incursion at the Turn of the Century]. Kyiv, 2013, 672 p. (in Russian).

Vasyliev E. M. Suchasna dramaturhiia: zhanrovi transformatsiï, modyfikatsiï, novatsiï [Modern Drama: Genre Transformations, Modifications, Innovations]. Lutsk, 2017, 532 p. (in Ukrainian).

Hundorova T. І. Pisliachornobyl′s′ka biblioteka. Ukraïns′kyi literaturnyi postmodernizm [Post-Chornobyl Library. Ukrainian Literary Postmodernism]. – Kyiv, 2013, 344 p. (in Ukrainian).

Egorov B. F. O masterstve literaturnoi kritiki. Zhanry. Kompozitsiia [On the Excellence of Literary Critics. Genres. Composition]. Leningard, 1980, 316 p. (in Russian).

Egorov B. F. Ot Khomiakova do Lotmana [From Khomyakov to Lotman]. Moscow, 2003, 363 p. (in Russian).

Ermichev A. A. O prirode russkoi filosofii [On the Nature of Russian Philosophy]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PLsbJ58GeM (accessed 30 October 2018). (in Russian).

Kaznacheev S. M. Sovremennye russkie poety [Contemporary Russian Poets]. Moscow, 2006, 304 p. (in Russian).

Literaturoznavchyi slovnyk-dovidnyk [Dictionary-Directory of Literary Studies]. Kyiv, 1997, 752 p. (in Ukrainian).

Losev A. F. Zhizn' (Povesti, rasskazy, pis'ma) [Life (Stories, Narratives, Letters)]. Saint Petersburg, 1993. Available at: http://lib.ru/FILOSOF/LOSEW/life.txt (accessed 30 October 2018). (in Russian).

Mamardashvili M. Kak ia ponimaiu filosofiiu [The Way I Understand Philosophy]. Moscow, 1992, 415 p. (in Russian).

Musiy V. B. Obraz “svoego”, “inogo”, “chuzhogo” v russkoi proze pervoi poloviny XIX veka [The Image of “mine”, “alien”, and “different” in the Russian Prose of the Early XX Century]. Odesa, 2011, 168 p. (in Russian).

Stepanova A. A. Poetologiia faustovskoi kul'tury. “Zakat Evropy” Osval'da Shpenglera i literaturnyi protsess 1920–1930-kh gg. [The Poetics of Faust Culture: “The Decline of the West” by Oswald Spengler and the Literary Process in the 1920s – 1930s]. Dnipropetrovsk, 2013, 496 p. (in Russian).

Frizman L. Ivan Franko: Vzgliad na literaturu [Ivan Franko: A View on Literature]. Kyiv, 2017, 608 p. (in Russian).

Chervіnska O. V. Arhumenty formy [The Arguments of Form]. Chernіvtsі, 2015, 384 p. (in Ukrainian).

Chervіnska O. V. Retseptyvna poetyka. Istoryko-metodolohichni ta teoretychni zasady [Receptive Poetics. Historical-Methodological and Theoretical Basics]. Chernіvtsі, 2001, 56 p. (in Ukrainian).

Published

2018-12-28

How to Cite

Oliander, L. “The Genre of ‘View’ and Its Modifications: The Monographs by O. V. Bogdanova and L. G. Frizman in the Context of Monographs by E. M. Vasyliev, T. I. Hundorova, B. F. Egorov, V. B. Musiy, and Others”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 98, Dec. 2018, pp. 342-55, doi:10.31861/pytlit2018.98.342.

Issue

Section

Literary Historiography