Playing up the Neomythological Structures of “Ulysses” J. Joyce in “Murphy” S. Beckett

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2018.98.253

Keywords:

absurdization, James Joyce, motif of betrayal, parodical reduction, Penelope, reminiscences, Samuel Beckett

Abstract

The article deals with the сharacter and specific features in playing up the ancient myth in “Ulysses” by James Joyce and “Murphy” by Samuel Beckett. The schemes and techniques of playing up the mythological structures of “Ulysses” J. Joyce in “Murphy” S. Beckett are distinguished, the reminiscences in “Murphy”, related to the mythological characters of “Ulysses” are defined, the way and principles of parody the neomythological schemes of “Ulysses” in “Murphy” are explored.

Ancient heroes are presented in “Murphy” through the prism of “Ulysses”. S. Beckett borrows the Odysseus`s myth and interpritates it in his way. Besides, the characters of Penelope, Circe, Polyphemus, Siren, other mythological characters, and also scenes and motifs, played up in the parodic way in both novels, are studied. And parody in “Murphy” is increased: Penelope-Molly Bloom is cheating her husband Odysseus-Leopold Bloom in “Ulysses”, in “Murphy” Penelope-Celia is working as a prostitute; Circe-Bella Cohen is the brothel-mistress in “Ulysses”, in “Murphy” Circe-Rosa is an old spinster. A scene with Sirens is inversed: Sirens in “Ulysses” are barmaids, in “Murphy” the main character, Murphy is a Siren and a waitress Vera is an object of his influence.

The principles of Joyce world view, presented in “Ulysses”, aspiration for universalities, world`s epiphanity, idea of eternal returning are denied by S. Beckett according to his position about life as a vain, absurd and exhausting. The ways of playing up the neomythological structures of “Ulysses” in “Murphy” are: inversions, parodical reduction, reduction to absurd.

Author Biography

Yelyzaveta Vasyliuk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

History of Foreign Literature and Classical Philology Department

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

4, Ploshcha Svobody, 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Bakhtin M. M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaia kul'tura srednevekov'ia i Renessansa [Rabelais and Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moscow, 1965, 526 p. (in Russian).

Beckett S. Merfi [Murphy]. Kyiv, 2000, 395 p. (in Russian).

Garin I. I. Vek Dzhoisa [Joyce's Century]. Moscow, 2002, 848 p. (in Russian).

Golubkov S. E. Romany Semiuela Bekketa [Samuel Beckett's Novels]. PhD dissertation. Moscow, 2002, 150 p. (in Russian).

Hurduz A. Mifopoetychna paradyhma v ukraïns′kii ta zakhidnoiievropeis′kii “prozi pro zemliu” kintsia XIX pershoi tretyny XX st., [Mythopoetic Paradigm in Ukrainian and West European “Land Prose”]. Mykolaiv, 2008, 214 p. (in Ukrainian).

Joyce J. Uliss [Ulysses]. Kyiv, 2015, 733 p. (in Ukrainian).

Ivanova Iu. A. Kategoriia mifologicheskogo vremeni v sovremennom romane-mife: na primere romana Dzheimsa Dzhoisa “Uliss” [Mythological Time Categoryin the Modern Novel-Myth: Example of “Ulysses” by James Joyce]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation. Saint Petersburg, 2002, 23 p. (in Russian).

Krasniashchykh A. P. Dzhois i Bekket. Bez prava perepiski [Joyce and Beckett. No Correspondence]. Russkii Zhurnal, 2012. Available at: http://www.russ.ru/pole/Dzhojs-i-Bekket.-Bez-prava-perepiski# (accessed 12 September 2018). (in Russian).

Leksykon zahal′noho ta porivnial′noho literaturoznavstva [Lexicon of the Contemporary Literary Criticism]. Chernivtsi, 2001, 636 p. (in Ukrainian).

Meletinskii E. M. Poetika mifa [The Poetics of Myth], Moscow, 2000, 407 p. (in Russian).

Rudnev V. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' kul'tury XX veka. Kliuchevye poniatiia i teksty [Encyclopedic Dictionary of the XXth Century. The Key Concepts and Texts]. Moscow, 2001, 350 p. (in Russian).

Khoruzhii S. S. “Uliss” v russkom zerkale [“Ulysses” in the Russian Mirror]. Moscow, 2015, 384 p. (in Russian).

Khoruzhii S. S. Kak Chitat' "Ulissa" [How to read “Ulysses”]. Inostrannaia literatura, 1989, no. 1, pp. 214–217. (in Russian).

Khoruzhii S. S. Kommentarii [Comments] In: Joyce J. Uliss. Moscow, 2013, pp. 730–924. (in Russian).

Fateeva N. A. Kontrapunkt intertekstual'nosti, ili intertekst v mire tekstov [The Contrapunkt of the Intertextuality, or the Intertext in the World of Texts]. Moscow, 2000, 280 p. (in Russian).

Eliot T. S. “Uliss”, poriadok i mif [“Ulysses”, the Order and The Myth]. Inostrannaia literatura, 1988, no. 12, pp. 226–228. (in Russian).

Gluck B. R. Beckett and Joyce. Friendship and Fiction. London, 1979, 229 p.

Ronsley J. Myth and Reality in Irish Literature. Ontario, 1977, 317 p.

Published

2018-12-28

How to Cite

Vasyliuk, Y. “Playing up the Neomythological Structures of “Ulysses” J. Joyce in ‘Murphy’ S. Beckett”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 98, Dec. 2018, pp. 253-68, doi:10.31861/pytlit2018.98.253.

Issue

Section

Intertextuality and Intermediality