Intermedial Metadramatic Measurements: Children's Cinema of 1960–1980's

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2018.98.229

Keywords:

metadrama, metatheatrality, intermediality, cinematography, cinematography for children, intertextuality, metacharacter

Abstract

The article attempts to apply the common concept of metadrama and metatheatrality, developed by L. Abel, J. Calderwood, J. Schlüter, P. Hornby, S. Sviontek, K. Vieweg-Marks, and others related to dramaturgy, to the phenomena of cinema. The problem of theatricality in cinema aesthetics and the history of world cinema is touched upon. The research material is the work of the national cinema for children of the 1960s–1980s, primarily Rolan Bykov’s films (“Seven Nannies”, “Aibolit-66”, “Automobile, Violin and Blot the Dog”). Various manifestations of metatheatrality are analyzed in the films for children: “Mama” (“Rock'n'Roll Wolf»), “The Adventures of Buratino”, “New Adventures of Captain Vrungel”, “A Merry Dream, or Laughter and Tears”, film dilogy about Petrov and Vasechkin, etc. The phenomena of metacharacter (a character who is aware of himself as a character) in children's films are also explored. Characters of Rolan Bykov's films can be categorized as metacharacters: they also perceive themselves as actors, not human beings, articulate their “artificiality”, are aware of their fictional character. Manifestations of metadrama diversify film text, bring a bright game element, create an atmosphere of theatricality, carnival, festivity. Metadramatism makes the viewer think about aesthetic problems, in particular, artistic convention, the boundaries between art (“screen”) and reality (“audience”), their expansion and even destruction. Metadrama techniques contribute to the convergence of the aesthetics of cinema and theatre.

Author Biography

Eugene Vasiliev, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University

Department of Germanic philology and foreign literature

Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University

V. Berdichivska str., 40, 10008, Zhytomyr, Ukraine

References

Aibolit-66 [Aibolit-66]. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B9%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82-66 (accessed 17 November 2018). (in Russian).

Bykov R. Pochemu “Aibolit-66”? [Why is “Aibolit-66”?]. Available at: https://fantlab.ru/article775 (accessed 17 November 2018). (in Russian).

Bykov R. A. Ia pobit – nachnu snachala [I am beaten – I'll start over]. Moscow, 2011, 752 p. (in Russian).

Vasiliev A. Vystavka erundy [The Exhibition of Nonsense]. Available at: http://seance.ru/blog/esse/rolan_dolan/ (accessed 17 November 2018). (in Russian).

Vasyliev E. M. Metapersonazh: popytka terminologicheskogo obosnovaniia kategorii [Metacharacter: An attempt of establishing the terminological category]. Aktual′ni problemy literaturoznavchoï terminolohiï. Rivne, 2015, pp. 150–154. (in Russian).

Vasyliev E. M. Metapersonazh v modernistskoi i postmodernistskoi dramaturgii. [Metacharacter in modern and postmodern drama]. Problemy moderna i postmoderna. Saint-Petersburg, 2016, no. VI, pp. 21–27. (in Russian).

Vasyliev E. M. Suchasna dramaturhiia: zhanrovi transformatsiï, modyfikatsiï, novatsiï [Contemporary drama: genre transformations, modifications, innovations]. Lutsk, 2017, 532 p. (in Ukrainian).

Visych O. A. Typolohiia metadramy v suchasnomu literaturoznavstvi [The typology of metadrama in contemporary literary criticism] Aktual′ni problemy literaturoznavchoï terminolohiï. Rivne, 2017, no. 2, pp. 165–169. (in Ukrainian).

Jelinek E. Chto sluchilos' posle togo kak Nora ostavila muzha, ili Stolpy obshchestva [What happened after Nora left her husband, or the Pillars of society]. In: Jelinek E. Bolezn', ili Sovremennye zhenshchiny. Moscow, 2009, pp. 5–106. (in Russian).

Zakaliuzhnyi L. V. Modyfikatsiï pryiomu “teatr u teatri” v suchasnii ukraïns′kii drami: intermedial′nyi aspect [Modifications of “the play-within-the-play” technique in contemporary Ukrainian drama: intermedial aspect]. Aktual′ni problemy literaturoznavchoï terminolohiï. Rivne, 2017, no. 2, pp. 173–176. (in Ukrainian).

Lipisivitsky M. L. Rysy metadramatychnosti i metadramy iak metavydu mystetstva u malykh dramatychnykh formakh [Features of metadramatics and metadrama in short forms of drama]. Aktual′ni problemy literaturoznavchoï terminolohiï. Rivne, 2017, no. 2, pp. 169–173. (in Ukrainian).

Pavis P. Slovnyk teatru [Theatre Dictionary]. Lviv, 2006, 640 p. (in Ukrainian).

Pirandello L. Shest' personazhei v poiskakh avtora [Six Characters in Search of an Author]. In: Pirandello L. P'esy. Moscow, 1960, pp. 345–410 (in Russian).

Smagina S. A. Teatralizatsiia kinematografa [Theatricalization of cinema]. Moscow, 2014, 134 p. (in Russian).

Abel L. Metatheatre: A new view of a dramatic form. New York, 1963, 161 p.

Calderwood J. Shakespearean Metadrama: The Argument of the Play in Titus Andronicus, Love's Labour's Lost, Romeo and Juliet, A Midsummer Night's Dream and Richard II. Minneapolis, 1971, 192 p.

Hornby R. Drama, Metadrama and Perception. London, Toronto, 1986, 189 p.

Schlueter J. Metafictional Characters in Modern Drama. New York, 1979, 143 p.

Swiontek S. Le dialogue dramatique et le metathéâtre. Zagadnienia Rodzajôw Literackich. 1993, 36. 1-2, p. 18–30.

Vieweg-Marks K. Metadrama und englisches Gegenwartsdrama. Frankfurt am Main, 1989, 221 S.

Published

2018-12-28

How to Cite

Vasiliev, E. “Intermedial Metadramatic Measurements: Children’s Cinema of 1960–1980’s”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 98, Dec. 2018, pp. 229-52, doi:10.31861/pytlit2018.98.229.

Issue

Section

Intertextuality and Intermediality