Verbalization of Postmemory in Language of Art

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2018.97.147

Keywords:

postmemory, trauma, generational distance, empathy, verbal/nonverbal transmission of memory, familial and affiliative transmission of memory, places of memory

Abstract

The study tested the phenomenon of postmemory, its main points, ways of verbal/nonverbal utterance and its connection with different kinds of art. As this occurrence is topical in many domains we can find lots of different attempts to name, to comprehend and even to interpret it. And a very important role in this context belongs to the foundress of this definition – professor from Columbia University Marianne Hirsch. Inspired by Spiegelman’s comic Maus and by her family stories, she developed her ideas and observations concerning the concept of postmemory in every subsequent work. The proposed theory caused the appearance of many new researches, articles, monographs on this topic and interpretations of works of art and historic, cultural occurrences. Hirsch explains this phenomenon as a kind of memory when the second generation remembers the recollections which they couldn’t live by their own. One from the denotative peculiarities of such memory according to her suggestions is imaginative investment and creation, namely memories which can be inherited by subsequent generations and which become a part of their experience exactly in consequence of imagination and empathy. As a result of such “reliving” there always can be a risk – to lost the border between own and “inherited” memories. In such case the best way to reveal postmemory is art, verbalization of it in the language of literature, music, painting, etc.

Author Biography

Iryna Shchepna, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

Department of Ukrainian Literature

Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

Universytetska Street, 1, 79000, Lviv, Ukraine

References

Assmann, Jan. Kulturnaia pamiat’: Pis’mo, pamiat’ o proshlom i politicheskaia identichnost’ v vysokikh kul’turakh drevnosti [Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remambrance, and Political Imagination]. Moscow, 2004, 368 p. (in Russian).

Rymaruk, Ihor. Sl’oza Bohorodytsi [Holy Mother’s tear]. Kyiv, 2004, 400 p. (in Ukrainian).

Hirsch, Marianne. Est’ raznitsa mezhdu postpamiat’iu i mobilizatsiiei patrioticheskikh chustv [There is a difference between postmemory and mobilization of patriotic feelings]. Available at: http://urokiistorii.ru/node/53499 (accessed 21 October 2016). (in Russian).

Berry, Marsha; Cole, Catherine. History and postmemory in contemporary Vietnamese literature. University of Wollongong, 2011, 8 p. Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1254&context=creartspapers (accessed 21 October 2016).

Findlay, Angela. Art and Postmemory. Available at: https://www.angelafindlaytalks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Dissertation-within-the-context.pdf (accessed 21 October 2016).

Grynberg, Mikołaj. Oskarżam Auschwitz. Opowieści rodzinne. Wołowiec, 2014, 304 st.

Hirsch, Marianne. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Cambridge MA, 1997, 304 p.

Hirsch, Marianne. POSTMEMORY. Definition. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0XdO1EEGdk (accessed 21 October 2016).

Hirsch, Marianne. The Generation of Postmemory. Poetics Today, 2008, no. 29:1, pp. 103–128. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/8973119/The_Generation_of_Postmemory (accessed 21 October 2016).

Hoffman, Eva. After Such Knowledge: Memory, History, and the Legacy of the Holocaust. New York, 2004, 301 p.

Jilovsky, Esther. Recreating Postmemory? Children of Holocaust Survivors and the Journey to Auschwitz. Colloquy: Text, Theory, Critique, 2008, no. 15, pp. 145–162. Available at: http://artsonline.monash.edu.au/colloquy/download/colloquy_issue_fifteen/jilovsky.pdf (accessed 21 October 2016).

Irigaray, Luce. Passions élémentaires. Paris, 1982, 130 p.

Kuchta, Anna. Zawłaszczone narracje. Obrazy postpamięci w zbiorze Oskarżam Auschwitz. Opowieści rodzinne Mikołaja Grynberga”. Konteksty kultury, 2015, t. 12, nr. 2, ss. 251–264. Available at: http://www.ejournals.eu/Konteksty_Kultury/2015/Tom-12-zeszyt-2/art/5366 (accessed 21 October 2016).

Margalit, Avishai. The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA & London, England, 2004, 240 p.

Norton, Julianne. Canvassing Generations: Art through Postmemory. University of Connecticut, 2012, 16 p. Available at: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=srhonors_holster (accessed 21 October 2016).

Pierce K Lewis. Axioms for Reading the Landscape: Some Guides to the American Scene. In: The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes. New York ; Oxford, 1979, pp. 11–32. Available at: http://www.larduser.net/writingcincy/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Reading-Landscapes.pdf (accessed 21 October 2016).

Schama, Simon. Landscape and memory. London, 1996, 672 p.

Sturken, Marita. Imaging Postmemory/renegotiating History. Afterimage, 1999, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 10–12.

Published

2018-06-29

How to Cite

Shchepna, I. “Verbalization of Postmemory in Language of Art”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 97, June 2018, pp. 147-61, doi:10.31861/pytlit2018.97.147.

Issue

Section

Intertextuality and Intermediality