Russian-Soviet Literature of the 1960s and 1970s: Motherhood in Disguise, or A Male Anti-Feminist Rhethoric for what it’s Worth

Authors

  • Olga Tabachnikova University of Central Lancashire

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2017.96.187

Keywords:

гендер, феминизм, анти-феминистская риторика, советская литература, материнство, патриархальный/матриархальный

Abstract

This paper looks into the Russian Soviet literature of both the “thaw” and “stagnation” periods (1960s and 1970s) in order to reassess the existing paradigm in its critical reception provided from the gender perspective. The discussion starts with consideration of the issue of motherhood – especially in the case of working mothers – and its literary treatment, but then expands to a feminist reading of the literature in question more generally. By suggesting an alternative interpretation of literary works of this period, especially those authored by male writers, the paper challenges the accepted understanding of this literature as essentially misogynistic. By revealing concealed insecurities behind hostile male rhetoric, it turns the tables round to argue that the prevailing model that arises from this literature is, in figurative terms, that of all pervasive motherhood, and as such is actually matriarchal. Thus, the suggestion made, is that this literature should be viewed at least as two-fold: superficially misogynistic, but matriarchal in spirit.

Author Biography

Olga Tabachnikova, University of Central Lancashire

Reader in Russian, Subject Leader for Russian Studies

School of Language and Global Studies

University of Central Lancashire

Adelphi Street, PR1 2HE, Preston, England

References

Ariev, A. Nasha malenkaia zhizn: predislovie [Our little life: introduction:]. In: Dovlatov, S. Sobranie prozy v 3 tomakh. St Petersburg, 1993, vol. 1, pp. 5–24.

Vysotsky, V. Dialog u televizora [Dialogue by the TV set]. In: Sobranie sochinenii : v 4 kn. Kniga vtoraia. My vrashchaem zemliu. Moscow, 1997, pp. 358–360.

Dovlatov, S. Chemodan [Suitcase]. In: Dovlatov, S. Sobranie prozy v 3 tomakh. St Petersburg, 1993, vol. 2, pp. 245–340.

Nagibin, Y. Predislovie (Nadezhda Kozhevnikova. Elena prekrasnaia. Povest') [A short preface to Nadezhda Kozhevnikova, “Elena Prekrasnaia”]. Novyi Mir, 1982, no. 9, p. 15.

Pasternak, B. Doktor Zhivago; Avtobiograficheskaia proza; Izbrannye pis'ma [Doctor Zhivago; Autobiographical prose; Selected correspondence]. Moscow, 1998, 742 p.

Radzinsky, E. Teatral'nyi roman [The Theatrical Novel]. A TV series shown by NTV, Russia (2004).

Shukshin, V. Rasskazy [Short stories]. Moscow, 1984, 284 p.

Carsten, S. In the Shadow of a Prominent Partner: Educated Women in Literature on the shestidesiatniki. In: R. Marsh (ed). Women and Russian Culture. Projections and Self-Perceptions. New-York-Oxford, 1998, pp. 259–274.

Curtis, J. Iuliia Voznesenskaia: a Fragmentary Vision. In: R. Marsh (ed). Women and Russian Culture. Projections and Self-Perceptions. New-York-Oxford, 1998, pp. 173–187.

Gillespie, D. Is Village Prose Misogynistic? In: R. Marsh (ed). Women and Russian Culture. Projections and Self-Perceptions. New-York-Oxford, 1998, pp. 234–243.

Heldt, B. Terrible Perfection. Women and Russian Literature. Bloomington and Indianopolis, 1987, 174 p.

Kelly, C. A History of Russian Women's Writing 1820–1992. Oxford, 1994, 497 p.

Lanin, B. The Images of Women in the Prose of Sergei Dovlatov. In: R. Marsh (ed). Women and Russian Culture. Projections and Self-Perceptions. New-York-Oxford, 1998, pp. 252–258.

Marsh, R. Introduction. In: R. Marsh (ed). Women and Russian Culture. Projections and Self-Perceptions. New-York-Oxford, 1998, pp. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26740-8_1

Vinokurova, N. Re-privatising women's lives: from Khrushchev to Brezhnev. In: R. Kay (ed.). Gender, Equality and Difference during and after State Socialism. Basingstoke, 2008, pp. 63–84.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-21

How to Cite

Tabachnikova, O. “Russian-Soviet Literature of the 1960s and 1970s: Motherhood in Disguise, or A Male Anti-Feminist Rhethoric for What it’s Worth”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 96, Dec. 2017, pp. 187-03, doi:10.31861/pytlit2017.96.187.

Issue

Section

Methodology and Gender Studies