Farce Genre Modifications in Contemporary Dramaturgy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2017.95.062

Keywords:

contemporary drama, dramatic genres, genre modification, farce, genre specificity, typology

Abstract

Along with the genre forms that have not stopped their development for many centuries, but have gained significant transformations (tragedy, comedy, drama, melodrama, tragicomedy), there are also numerous genres, whichfell out of the history of drama for a long time (often for centuries) and were not claimed by theatrical art. However, in the drama of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century the clear tendency for the revival and modification of archaic genres, first of all, seemingly, “dead” genres of the medieval theater is characteristic. In its genre system religious drama genres (especially mystery and miracle plays), didactic (pritch, parable) and comic (farce, interlude, commedia dell'arte) occupy an important place. The article discusses the features of genre modifications of medieval farce in contemporary dramaturgy. A typology of contemporary farce is also suggested (three types are conventional farce, black farce and socio-political farce). Genre signs, features of the plot and of farce in the works of European dramaturgy of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries (M. Frein, M. Kamoletti, D. Orton, P. Schaeffer, E. Nelison, G. Adam, A. Bitton and others) are researched. Scientific (L. Smith, A. Sierz, S. Goncharova-Grabovskaya, N. Malyutina etc.) and author's (R. Cooney) reflections on the farcical genre module are considered.

Author Biography

Yevheniy Vasilyev, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University

Department of Germanic philology and foreign literature

Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University

V. Berdichivska str., 40, 10008, Zhytomyr, Ukraine

References

Goncharova-Grabovskaya S. Y. Komediia v russkoi dramaturgii kontsa XX – nachala XXІ veka [Comedy in the Russian drama of the end of the XX century – the beginning of the XXI century]. Moscow, 2006, 280 p. (in Russian).

Maliutina N. P. Ukrains′ka dramaturhiia kintsia XІX – pochatku XX stolittia: aspekty rodo-zhanrovoi dynamiky [Ukrainian drama of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: aspects of generic and genre dynamics]. Odesa, 2006, 352 p. (in Ukrainian).

Sakhnovskii-Pankeev V. O komedii [On Comedy]. Leningrad, Moscow, 1964, 223 p. (in Russian).

Adam H. The People Next Door. London, 2003, 85 p.

Bean R. Plays Three: Harvest; In the Club; The English Game; Up on Roof. London, 2009, 96 p.

Beaton A. Feelgood. London, 2001, 106 p.

Davis J. Farce. London, 1978, 111 p.

Davison P. Contemporary Drama and the Popular Dramatic Tradition in England. London, 1982, 193 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05177-9

Jordan T. Farce, in and out of the Bedroom. Available at: https://www.wheelercentre.com/notes/farce-in-and-out-of-the-bedroom (accessed 15 September 2017).

Ray Cooney's six rules of farce. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/10688416/Ray-Cooneys-six-rules-of-farce.html (accessed 15 September 2017).

Sierz A. Rewriting the nation. British theatre today. London, 2011, 288 p. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408166819

Smith L. Modern British farce. A selective study of British farce from Pinero to present day. London, 1989, 242 p.

The Methuen drama Dictionary of the Theatre. London, 2011, 560 p.

Worth K. Revolutions in Modern English Drama. London, 1972, 194 p.

Published

2017-11-21

How to Cite

Vasilyev, Y. “Farce Genre Modifications in Contemporary Dramaturgy”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 95, Nov. 2017, pp. 62-77, doi:10.31861/pytlit2017.95.062.

Issue

Section

Genre Study