Autobiographies of the Writers of the 1960s: Fictional and Factual Modi of Perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2014.89.295Keywords:
autobiography, biography, fictional-documentary prose, metagenreAbstract
The article interprets genre peculiarities of a writer’s autobiography as one of the components of fictional-documentary metagenre. As the object of study the author chose autobiographies of the Ukrainian writers of the 1960s in whose works such a genealogical construction is local and is present only in the heritage of V. Didenko, B. Necherda, N. Svitlychna, V. Stus and Hryhir Tiutiunyk. In contrast to large epic works that are traditionally considered autobiographical autobiography properly is inclined to genre forms of small size created from the first person and enlightens the most important moments of the writer’s life and creative work in chronological succession. Such samples are based upon the definite scheme mainly used in clerical work. The writers’ autobiographies are written according to a certain template, the fictional components in them yield their informative level to the documentary facts but they reveal programmed life guidelines and world-view beliefs of the writers. By their thematic and style creating features autobiographies are quite heterogeneous and can be subordinated to certain systematization. Our observations enable to suggest our own classification of chronology writings represented by three varieties: factual, fictional and mixed. In such a format they get rid of the dependence on memoir prose and function fully as an independent artistic phenomenon, reflecting mainly life and creative credo of their author. Autobiographies are devoid of compositional, fable and narrative homogeneity, they are characterized by the diversity of the form, content and style.
References
Bakhtin M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov [The Problem of Speech Genres]. In: Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva, Moscow, 1979, pp. 237–280. (in Russian).
Burlina E. Kul’tura i zhanr. Metodologicheskiye problemy zhanroobrazovaniya i zhanrovogo sinteza [Culture and Genre. Methodological Problems of Genre Formation and Synthesis]. Saratov, 1987, 165 p. (in Russian).
Halych O. Khudozhnia dokumentalistyka na zlami tysiacholit’: spetsyfika, geneza, perspektyvy [Documentary Fiction at the Turn of the Millennium]. Luhans’k, 2001, 246 p. (in Ukrainian).
Didenko V. Avtobiohrafiia [Autobiography]. In: „Ya syn velykoho narodu” Vasyl’ Didenko u spohadakh, lystakh i poezii. Zaporizhzhia, 2001, p. 7. (in Ukrainian).
Dub K. Avtobiohrafichnyi synerhen [Autobiographical synergy]. Slovo i chas, 2001, no. 4, pp. 15–23. (in Ukrainian).
Lejeune Ph. V zashchitu avtobiografii: Esse raznykh let [Defending autobiography: Essays From Different Years]. Inostrannaya litaretura, 2000, no. 4., pp. 109–122. (in Russian).
Leiderman N. Dvizheniye vremeni i zakony zhanra: Zhanrovye zakonomernosti razvitiya sovetskoy prozy v 60–70‑e gody [The Movement of Time and the Laws of Genre: Genre Patterns of the Soviet Prose Development in the 1960–70s]. Sverdlovsk, 1982, 256 p. (in Russian).
Literaturoznavcha entsyklopediia: u 2 t. [Literary Encyclopedia: in 2 v.]. Kyiv, 2007, vol. 1, 608 p.; vol. 2, 624 p. (in Ukrainian).
Necherda B. Avtobiohrafiia [Autobiography]. In: „Ya zhyv yak mih, ya ne lukavyv…”: Literaturna spadshchyna B. Necherdy: spohady pro pys’mennyka. Odesa, 2010, p. 7. (in Ukrainian).
Pidpalyi V. Avtobiohrafiia [Autobiography]. In: Zoloti dzhmeli. Kyiv, 2011, pp. 33–36. (in Ukrainian).
Podlubnova Yu. Metazhanry, megazhanry i drugiye zhanrovye obrazovaniya v russkoy literature [Metagenres, Megagenres and Other Genre Formations in Russian Literature]. In: Germenevtika literaturnykh zhanrov, Stavropol’, 2007, pp. 293-298. – Available at: http://www.proza.ru/2006/01/20-111 (accessed 10 January 2014). (in Russian).
Pustovit V. Problemy natsiieutvorennia v memuarnomu dyskursi vitchyznianykh pys’mennykiv XIX stolittia [The Problem of Nation Formation in Memoir Discourse by the Ukrainian Writers of the XIX Century]. Luhans’k, 2008, 284 p. (in Ukrainian).
Svitlychna N. Avtobiohrafiia [Autobiography]. In: Z zhyvuchoho plemeni Don Kikhotiv. Kyiv, 2008, pp. 413–416. (in Ukrainian).
Solovei E. Ukrains’ka filosofs’ka liryka [Ukrainian Philosophical Lyrics]. Kyiv, 1999, 368 p. (in Ukrainian).
Spivak R. Russkaya filosofskaya lirika. 1910‑e gody. I. Bunin, A. Blok, V. Mayakovsky [Russian Philosophical Lyrics. The 1910s. I. Bunin, A. Blok, V. Mayakovsky]. Moscow, 2005, 408 p. (in Russian).
Stuzhuk O. Khudozhnia fantastyka yak metazhanr (na materiali ukrains’koi literatury XIX–XX st.) [Fantasy as Metagenre (on the Material of the Ukrainian Literature of the XIX–XX cent.] Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Theory of Literature). Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kyiv, 2006, 16 p. (in Ukrainian).
Stus V. Avtobiohrafiia [Autobiography]. In: Tvory: v 6 t. L’viv , 1994, vol. 1, book 1, p. 42. (in Ukrainian).
Tiutiunnyk H. Avtobiohrafiia [Autobiography]. In: Vichna zahadka liubovi: Literaturna spadshchyna Hryhora Tiutiunnyka, spohady pro pys’mennyka. Kyiv, 1988, pp. 20–24.
Tsiapa A. Avtobiohrafiia yak proektsiia tvortsia ta natsional’no-kul’turni tradytsii (Ulas Samchuk, Elias Kanetti) [Autobiography as Projection of a Creator and National-Cultural Traditions (Ulas Samchuk, Elias Kanetti)]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Comparative literature). Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatyuk National Pedagogical University. Ternopil’, 2006, 20 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Oleh Rarytskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
