The Creation of Doxa (Legitimization of Knowledge and Institualization of Notions) in Gender Studies in the Study of Literature

Authors

  • Ganna Uliura Shevchenko Institute of Literature of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2013.88.210

Keywords:

gender studies, scientific knowledge, narrative knowledge, feminist epistemology, scientific language

Abstract

In the article analyzes the specifics of scientific knowledge legitimization in gender studies, actualized as the issue of the knowledge production point. Increased focus on gender studies in postmodern philology is linked to the general tendencies of science development, viz. with the search for theories able to provide alternative ways of knowledge. Gender studies in literature, as a theoretical project, in this sense are consonant to the search of the literary theory, as both see themselves in the review of humanitarian knowledge, at the core of which is the impossibility of a single critical notion of a human. It’s no coincidence that Joan Scott, reflecting on the analytic potential of gender approach, notes, that the discovery of gender coincided in time with a radical epistemological change, which marked in post-classic science the transition from scientific to literary paradigms. And in this field, gender studies, as well as the majority of modern critique theories, faces the requirement of researchers (such as a literature historian, for example) to realize their own research methods, which, however, contradicts the “basic” incapability to overcome their own subjectiveness. This lie of the land actualizes the problem of establishing gender studies in post-Soviet humanities in the context of scientific knowledge generation. In the article is analyzed Gender studies in the study of literature in such context appear as strategic inconsistently-sceptical theoretical project. 

Author Biography

Ganna Uliura, Shevchenko Institute of Literature of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Slavic Literature Department Shevchenko Institute of Literature of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine M. Hrushevskyi St., 4, 01001, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Braidotti R. Zavist', ili s tvoimi mozgami i moej krasotoj… [Envy, or with your brains and my beauty ...]. Gendernye issledovanija, 2006, no. 14, pp. 157–167. (in Russian).

Gaidenko V. A. Feministskaja jepistemologija kak postneklassicheskij fenomen [Feminist Epistemology as a Post-Nonclassic Phenomena]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Philosophy). Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kyiv, 2000, 20 p. (in Russian).

Gapova E. Gendernye issledovanija kak zerkalo postsovetskoj akademii [Gender studies as a mirror of the post-Soviet Academy]. In: Antropologija akademicheskoj zhizni: mezhdisciplinarnye issledovanija. Moscow, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 64–85. (in Russian).

Hundorova T. Metodolohichnyi tysk (Problemy ukraïns′koho literaturoznavstva) [Methodological Pressure (Problems of Ukrainian Literary Studies)]. Krytyka, 2002, no. 12, pp. 14–17. (in Ukrainian).

Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Jedip: Kapitalizm i shizofrenija [Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]. Ekaterinburg, 2008, 672 p. (in Russian).

Derrida J. Shpory: stili Nicshe [Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles]. Filosofskie nauki, 1991. no. 2, pp. 118–142; no. 3, pp. 114–129. (in Russian).

Lacan J. Seminary. Kniga 20 [The Seminar, Book XX]. Moscow, 2011, 176 p. (in Russian).

Lyotard J.-F. Sostojanie postmoderna [Toward the Postmodern]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, 1998, 160 p. (in Russian).

Marcuse H. Odnomernyj chelovek [One-Dimensional Man]. Moscow, 1994, 368 p. (in Russian).

Moi T. Seksual'naja/tekstual'naja politika: Feministskaja literaturnaja teorija [Sexual/textual politics: feminist literary theory]. Moscow, 2004. 240 p. (in Russian).

Oushakine S. Pole pola [Field of Sex].Vilnius, Moscow, 2007, 320 p. (in Russian).

Foucault M. Volja k istine: po tu storonu znanija, vlasti i seksual'nostі [The Will to Truth]. Moscow, 1996, 448 p. (in Russian).

Jakobson R. Lingvistika i pojetika [Linguistics and Poetics]. In: Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv”. Moscow, 1975, pp. 193–230. (in Russian).

Code L. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, New York, 1991. – 349 p.

Felman S. Women and Madness: The critical phallacy. Diacritics. Textual Politics Feminist Criticism, 1975, Winter, pp. 2–10.

Hix H. L. Spirits Hovering over the Ashes: Legacies of Postmodern Theory. Albany, 1995, 208 p.

Published

2013-12-06

How to Cite

Uliura, G. “The Creation of Doxa (Legitimization of Knowledge and Institualization of Notions) in Gender Studies in the Study of Literature”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 88, Dec. 2013, pp. 210-22, doi:10.31861/pytlit2013.88.210.

Issue

Section

Historical Poetics and History of Poetological Discourses