The Marginal Character’s Specificity in the Texts of German Writers Representing the 1968 Generation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2017.96.247

Keywords:

marginality, marginal hero, the 1968 generation, Uwe Timm, Peter Scnhneider, hero-rebel, hero-lumpen, hero-emigrant

Abstract

This article is an attempt of the interdisciplinary research of different sciences studying the phenomena of marginality, namely sociology, history, culturology and the study of literature. As the base of this research, the investigations from the theory on sociological marginality were taken (N. Akopyan, O. V. Butylina, J. S. Vorobyova, O. N. Makarenko, J. Mancini.)

The aim of this article is the analyses of the marginal character’s specificity in the texts of German writers, the representatives of the 1968 generation, namely in the Peter Scnhneider’s short story “Lenz” and Uwe Timm’s novel “Kerbel’s escape”. The works are interpreted as the result of an intensive processing of the revolutionary experience and are considered to be examples of the mentioned writer’s own version of the 1968 protest movement history literary textualization. The main character of the analyzed texts is the typical representative of the left-oriented intellectuals, which are transformed from the formerly active participants of the 1968 revolutionary into the marginal persons now.

The research finds out the specificity of the marginal character in the texts of the representatives of the 1968 generation, which is determined by several factors. These are namely: 1) the transformational processes in society associated with the revolutionary events in Germany in the late 60's and their results, mainly disappointment in the outcomes of revolutionary activity by specific individuals; 2) sociological factor related to the problems of adaptation to the new environment; 3) the psychological state of the protagonist, which is defined as boundary and peripheral in the face of the exit from the marginal group and the impossibility of its implementation beyond its borders. These protagonists are the expressions of various types of marginalization, representing those marginal heroes that evolve from the hero-rebel, the hero-lumpen and the hero-emigrant with different vectors for the development of their further marginalization.

Author Biography

Maryna Orlova, Cherkasy State Technological University

Department of Romano-Germanic Philology and Translation

Cherkasy State Technological University

Blvd. Shevchenko 460, 18000, Cherkasy, Ukraine

References

Akopian N. Marginal'nost' kak odna iz osnovnykh kharakteristik transformiruiushchegosia obshchestva [Marginality as one of the main features of the transforming society]. 21-i vek, 2005, no. 1, pp. 150–164. (in Russian).

Butylina O. V. Marhinal′na sytuatia: struktura ta sotsial′ni naslidky [Marginal situation: structure and social consequences]. Ukraïns′kyi sotsium, 2012, no. 2 (41), pp. 17–24. (in Ukranian).

Vorobiova E. S. Marginal'nyi geroi v russkoi proze poslednei treti XX – nachala XXI vv. [Marginal hero in the Russian literature oh the last third of the XXth and at the beginning of the XXIth century]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Russian literature). Arkhangelsk, 2015, 18 p. (in Russian).

Makarenko O. N. Osnovnye podkhody v izuchenii marginal'noi lichnosti v zapadnoi psikhologii [The main methods of the marginal person’s research in the western psychology]. Visnyk ONU imeni I. I. Mechnykova. Psykholohiia, 2012, no. 8 (20), pp. 703–709. (in Russian).

Pavlychko S. Teoria literatury [The theory of literary]. Kyiv, 2002, 679 p. (in Ukranian).

Popova I. P. Novye marginal'nye gruppy v rossiiskom obshchestve (teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniia) [The new marginal groups in the Russian society (the theoretical aspects of investigation)]. Sotsis, 1999, no. 7, pp. 62–71. (in Russian).

Halbwachs M. Kollektivnaia i istoricheskaia pamiat' [The collective and historical memory]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2005, no. 2–3 (40–41), pp. 8–27. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2005/2/ha2.html (accessed 7 July 2017). (in Russian).

wird 40: „Utopie – nein, doch, ja!”. Die Wiedergeburt einer alten Dimension“. In: Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SFR), 8. April 2008. Available at: http://www.srf.ch/sendungen/reflexe/68-wird-40-utopie-nein-doch-ja!-die-wiedergeburt-einer-alten-dimension (accessed 7 July 2017).

Assmann A. Geschichte im Gedächtnis : Von der individuellen Erfahrung zur öffentlichen Inszenierung. München, 2014, 219 S.

Brenner X. Die vergessene Utopie der 68er. Kommune, Forum für Politik, Ökonomie, Kultur, 3/2008.

Fehlenbrach K. Protestinszenierungen: Die Studentenbewegung im Spannungsfeld vom Kultur-Revolution und Medien-Evolution. In: Klimke Martin, Scharloth Joachim (Hrsg.). Handbuch 1968. Zur Kultur- und Mediengeschichte der Studentenbewegung. Stuttgart, Weimar, 2007, S. 11–21.

Gester J., Hajek W. (Hg.). 1968 – und dann? Bremen, 2002, 217 S.

Lüdke M. W. Bilder des Glücks oder die Frage nach dem Verlust der Utopie. In: Nach dem Protest! Literatur im Umbruch. Frankfurt am Main, 1979, S. 185–196.

Mancini B. J. No owner of soil : The concept of marginality revisited on its sixties birthday. International Revue of Modern Sociology. New Delhi, 1988, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 182–204.

Schmid T. Ein kollektiver Sonderweg Joschka Fischer und die Frankfurter Sponti-Szene. F.A.Z. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 08.01.2001, S. 012.

Schneider P. Lenz. Köln, 2010, 137 S.

Sontheimer K. Die gescheiterte Revolution: Zwischen Naivität und Gewaltbereitschaft. Die politische Meinung, 2001, Ausgabe 378. Available at: http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_1576-544-1-30.pdf?030702133325 (accessed 7 July 2017).

Timm U. Kerbels Flucht. München, 2011, 196 S.

Published

2017-12-21

How to Cite

Orlova, M. “The Marginal Character’s Specificity in the Texts of German Writers Representing the 1968 Generation”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 96, Dec. 2017, pp. 247-61, doi:10.31861/pytlit2017.96.247.

Issue

Section

Interdisciplinary Discourse